How Paul Stirling levelled up by slowing down

Once Ireland’s free spirit, Stirling has churned out ODI runs by embracing responsibility

Matt Roller27-Jan-2021In 2019, Paul Stirling had a decision to make. When Ireland were awarded Test status in 2017, the ECB provided Irish internationals with a two-year grace period in county cricket, after which they would only be able to play as their side’s overseas player, rather than as locals – unless they quit international cricket.As a British passport-holder, Stirling admitted that he was “baffled” at the situation, but decided against a legal challenge and was left a choice between renewing his contract at Middlesex, where he had spent 10 years as a professional, and extending his international career.While some of his Ireland team-mates opted for the security and stability of a county deal, Stirling chose the other path. “When he texted me to say he had committed to Ireland and wasn’t going to continue with Middlesex, I was delighted,” Andy Balbirnie, Ireland’s captain, recalled. “Every team around the world would want him.”It is easy to see why he was so enthusiastic. Once a dasher who would throw his hands at the new ball and hope, Stirling has become one of the world’s most consistent opening batsmen, especially in 50-over cricket, the format which comes most naturally to him. Since international cricket restarted in July 2020 after its Covid-enforced hiatus, Stirling has made four ODI hundreds in eight innings; Steven Smith, with two, is the only other batsman to have compiled more than one.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhile it had never been in doubt that Stirling was a player with bags of natural talent, there had been legitimate questions a decade into his international career as to whether he would reach his potential.Having made his debut at 17, Stirling’s ODI average was an impressive 42.48 after 32 innings, with a strike rate of 95.43 denoting his aggressive style at the top of the order. In his next 40 innings, he lost his way: he passed 50 only four times, averaging 24.82 across a six-year period which even included a fleeting shift down to No. 6 as a ploy to combat Afghanistan’s spinners.But in his 50 most recent innings, dating back to March 2017, he averages 49.22, with a more conservative strike rate of 84.57 demonstrating the extent to which he has reined in his instincts and adapted his game to perform the role of a senior batsman in a team in transition. Seven of his 12 ODI hundreds have come in that time, with his three in Abu Dhabi this month taking him past William Porterfield’s previous Ireland record of 11. He dedicated the most recent two, against Afghanistan, to the late Roy Torrens, whom he described as “an absolute hero”.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn particular, Stirling has been exceptional against spin, a quality that might not be obvious in a player brought up on green Belfast pitches. Since mid-March 2017, he has scored at a marginally slower strike rate against spinners (83.33) than seamers (86.11), but his average of 78.57 facing spin is up there with the world’s best, after honing his methods against Afghanistan’s ‘big three’ – Rashid Khan, Mohammad Nabi and Mujeeb Ur Rahman – and the best in the associate game.Essentially, Stirling realised in his mid-to-late 20s that it was no longer enough for him to swing through the line and hope. “You get bored of getting to 30, hitting it in the air and getting out,” he told ESPNcricinfo earlier this month. “From there you think, ‘actually, I quite like batting – maybe I’ll try and bat a little longer’.”I got off to a really good start in ODI cricket and I probably took it for granted a little bit. I think it’s my favourite format – it’s the one where I feel I can just bat. To me, that’s the most natural you can be. I can walk out there and not have to think too hard, and naturally strike the ball well and score at a strike rate that’s OK.”Stirling displayed his ability against spin during his 142 vs England and Adil Rashid in August 2020•AFP via Getty ImagesRather than any major technical changes, Stirling attributes his improvements over the last four years to a shift in mindset. He still attacks in the powerplay when he can, but not at the expense of throwing his wicket away. “It comes down to experience. I definitely had a shift. I think I was averaging 40-plus in ODI cricket and it slid down maybe even into the early 30s. That’s when I was like ‘right, it’s time to make some improvements here’. You ask yourself, ‘what do you want, to score quick 30s or make match-winning scores?'”In particular, he hails the influence of Graham Ford, who sat him down upon becoming head coach in December 2017 to tell him that he would not settle for sporadic brilliance. “He made his point very clear, which was that I’m here to score runs, not to score pretty 20s and 30s to stay in the team,” Stirling recalled. “I thought that was good. If he hadn’t done that, I could have just continued on my way, so he was certainly a big help.” When he became vice-captain last year, it seemed like a natural fit.As a result, Stirling’s recent record puts him in the company of the best in the game. Since the start of 2019, only Aaron Finch and Rohit Sharma have more ODI hundreds than him, and while their innings may have been against stronger opposition, they have not had to carry the rest of their respective batting line-ups in the way that Stirling has; in that timeframe, Stirling has scored 1351 ODI runs, while only one team-mate – Balbirnie – has breached the 500 mark.The upshot is that Stirling has levelled up by slowing down. Once Ireland’s free spirit, he has turned into a relentless run-scorer by embracing responsibility.

Tim Southee, the support act who is front and centre of New Zealand's best-ever attack

They have six players who could make their all-time Test XI, but you wouldn’t know that by looking at them

Danyal Rasool29-Dec-2020Earlier this week, the ICC announced its Test team of the decade, a side that raised eyebrows – and tempers – in Pakistan for the absence of anyone from the country in the XI. As for New Zealand, there was just one – Kane Williamson – in the list. And that, in a decade that has had up to five other players who can stake a claim to be in their country’s all-time Test XI: Ross Taylor, BJ Watling, Trent Boult, Tim Southee and Neil Wagner.Those in charge of cricket in New Zealand might not say so publicly, but the absence of more than Williamson in that XI even as they are there and thereabouts at the top of the Test rankings is a glowing compliment to them. It is a vindication of the system where the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. With three fast bowlers, two batsmen and a wicketkeeper-batsman in the side strong shouts for all-time greatness, New Zealand have managed to foster that rarest of things: a team choc-a-bloc with elite sportsmen that is very well balanced, yet curiously bereft of egos, internal rifts, or selfishness.Watch cricket on ESPN+

New Zealand vs Pakistan is available in the US on ESPN+. Subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to the series

It hasn’t, however, dimmed their relentless pursuit of excellence. Williamson began this decade a prospect and ends it a giant, and yet you sense that he doesn’t stay up at night moaning about a rare personal failure if he’s led his side to a Test win. Southee doesn’t sulk as Boult hoovers up most of the praise, while Wagner manages that seemingly impossible balance of giving this nice, mellow unit a nasty edge while also making himself the most lovable of them all. These may be top, top players, but for them, this remains very much a team game.The fourth day of the Boxing Day Test against Pakistan in Mount Maunganui ended with New Zealand seven wickets away from a 1-0 lead. Southee capped the day with his 300th Test wicket when he had Haris Sohail driving on the up to short cover. Southee, the frontman of a legendary New Zealand bowling attack where he’s almost talked about as something of a sidekick, particularly to his new-ball bowling partner Boult. And yet, despite a Test career that began nearly four years before Boult’s did – the age difference between the two is barely six months – Southee looks the stronger partner as they approach this lap of their careers.Boult is out of form by no metric besides the absurdly high standards he sets, but in that relative dry patch, Southee has seamlessly stepped in to do the heavy lifting. This summer, it has been Southee helping the side seize control early on, taking 11 wickets across the three opposition first innings in the three Tests; Boult has managed six overall. And while Boult went wicketless in the T20I series against Pakistan, Southee chipped in with six strikes in two matches to become the fifth-most prolific T20I wicket-taker.Still, while Wagner is the enforcer, Boult the key swing bowler up front, and Kyle Jamieson the fresh force, Southee is merely the team player that complements them nicely despite a career that perhaps shines brighter than any of the others’. Indeed, he is perhaps more talked about for his entertaining lower-order six-hitting than the specifics of what make him so successful with the ball, and that success is continuing unabated.Related

'I'd like to continue to play' – Tim Southee turns to James Anderson and Ross Taylor for inspiration

Jamieson: Fortunate to play in same era as NZ's greatest quicks

Wagner: Unless they carry me off on a stretcher, I'll be doing all I can

Since the start of 2018 – before the ongoing Test – Southee played 18 Tests and picked up 92 wickets at under 22. Shane Bond’s entire career, as Brendon McCullum pointed out on commentary, contains 87 wickets in 18 Tests at 22.05. But when he led his side off the field at the end of the day to generous applause from his team-mates and immense appreciation from the Mount Maunganui crowd, you could see the bashful smile, the slight discomfort at suddenly being the point of attention. Sidekicks don’t come much better, or lower-maintenance, than that.At the other end of the spectrum, Tom Blundell and Tom Latham were busy illustrating that same principle of putting the team first. If there has been an Achilles heel in this side of late, it’s been the opening pairing of the slightly out-of-touch Toms, with stands of 14, 31 and 4 in the three home Tests so far. Blundell, who you sense is undergoing a very successful apprenticeship for when Watling hangs up his gloves, illustrates further the extent to which team goals are prioritised over individual ones. He has been shunted up and down the order to suit team goals; remember he made a hundred on debut from No. 8.Tim Southee ended the fourth day with his 300th Test wicket•AFP via Getty ImagesBut with the two having responsibly seen off the new ball and ensured there was no chance for Pakistan to sneak back into the game, it might have been the perfect opportunity to face more deliveries, spend time out in the middle and get themselves some runs. After all, Blundell had just brought up his half-century, and Latham wasn’t far away, while Pakistan carried little threat by this point. And yet, with the score on 111, the manner of Blundell’s dismissal suggested padding up his statistics was the last thing on his mind at that moment.His captain wanted to have a crack at Pakistan before tea, so Blundell charged down the track to Mohammad Abbas, and when he missed, the ball smacked into his leg stump. He had scored 64, and would thus look respectable on the scoreboard, but it quickly became apparent the entire side, captain included, would practice what they had presumably preached to their openers. Williamson fell on 21 playing perhaps the ugliest shot of his career, a flat-batted tennis slap to a short delivery from around the wicket he ended up skying for Mohammad Rizwan to collect comfortably. Instead of irritation, he displayed only urgency, reminding Taylor before leaving that he needed to keep his foot on the accelerator.Contrary to what was seen when Pakistan’s top order batted on the third day, there was little self-preservation. Different scenarios, of course, but the home side appears to have created a culture where any evidence of self-preservation might be the quickest way of ensuring a ticket out of the team. By turning self-preservation into a self-defeating goal, the good of the team ends up being put on a pedestal almost by default.And what were New Zealand putting in all that effort for? To get 20 minutes at Pakistan before tea. On a potentially flat pitch where every little session counts, Williamson’s side knew they needed to give themselves the best possible chance of forcing a result. Those 20 minutes produced two wickets, one each for Southee and Boult.New Zealand began the decade with a ten-wicket loss at home to Pakistan. The hustle they went through just before tea might go a long way in ensuring they close it out with an emphatic win. It’s been a decade of doing the right things, and as New Zealand start sighting the inaugural World Test Championship final, a decade’s worth of improvement certainly shows.

India women: a year of cricket lost while other major teams played

A timeline of series planned, cancelled or postponed after the 2020 T20 World Cup

Annesha Ghosh07-Mar-2021Tour of England: cancelled
Scheduled for: September 2020
India men’s cricket at the time: No international series between March and August; IPL 2020 started on September 19
International women’s cricket at the time: Australia vs New Zealand; England vs West IndiesIndia were to kick off preparations for the ODI World Cup, initially scheduled for February-March 2021 in New Zealand, with a white-ball series against England, the reigning world champions, in July-August last year. The pandemic forced the England board to postpone the tour to September, and it then drew up plans to turn it into a tri-series involving South Africa, but the BCCI pulled out, because of the worsening Covid-19 situation in India – though this was not confirmed.ESPNcricinfo understands that discussions between the BCCI and the ECB are currently on to have India travel to England for a series in June-July 2021, ahead of the inaugural Hundred competition.Tour of Australia: postponed
Scheduled for: January 22-28, 2021
Indian men’s cricket at the time: Just completed a two-month long tour of Australia
International women’s cricket at the time: South Africa vs Pakistan
The India women’s tour to Australia was also part of the build-up to the 2021 World Cup, but there was silence from the BCCI about the prospects of the series. ESPNcricinfo reported on December 22 last year that the Indian board wasn’t keen on going ahead with the tour. Nine days later, Cricket Australia announced that the tour had been postponed to the following season.Sri Lanka tour: on the backburnerScheduled (tentatively) for: November-December 2020
India men’s at the time: Tour of Australia
International women’s cricket at the time: None; the 2020 Women’s T20 Challenge (November 4-9) and the WBBL (October 25-November 28) were underway
Other international women’s tours in the last year

Germany tour of Austria: August 2020
Pakistan tour of Zimbabwe (truncated): February 2021

Talks of an eight-match tour began in August-September 2020 after the cancellation of India’s tour of England, but concerns over the length of quarantine and a spike in Covid-19 cases in Sri Lanka forced an end to the discussions. ESPNcricinfo understands that the fixtures no longer feature in either board’s immediate plans. Sri Lanka are hoping to play their first international match since the T20 World Cup in May, either against Bangladesh or Pakistan.Series against West Indies: in limboScheduled dates: Not confirmedSoon after it was announced that the T20 Challenge would be held in November 2020, reports emerged that an India-West Indies series would be played before February-March 2021. BCCI president Sourav Ganguly had also said at the time that a camp would be organised for the centrally contracted India women players, but there has been no such camp in the past year, not even in the lead-up to the upcoming series against South Africa. Details about the series against West Indies haven’t resurfaced since.Series against South Africa: riddled with confusionThe home series against South Africa also went through a healthy dose of confusion and uncertainty before it was finally confirmed. An army recruitment drive in Kerala forced the matches out of the state before Lucknow was named as a replacement venue for all eight games.

Matt Critchley: 'Legspin is a niche market in itself but I bat in the top six, too'

Derbyshire allrounder is PCA’s April MVP after defying early-season stereotypes

Matt Roller06-May-2021The stereotype of county cricket in April is perhaps unfair, but not entirely unfounded: green pitches, thermos flasks, cable-knit jumpers, hand-warmers for slip fielders, and bags of wickets for medium-fast seam bowlers. In early-season Championship games, young English legspinners are nearly as rare as Fabergé eggs.But this April – thanks to unseasonably dry weather, surprisingly good pitches, and a revamped competition format – Lancastrian legspin was the flavour of the month: Bolton-born Matt Parkinson was the Championship’s joint-sixth-highest wicket-taker despite missing the first game of the season, and Matt Critchley, adopted by Derbyshire but brought up in Preston, was not far behind.And while Parkinson is a specialist in his craft, Critchley’s success has come on two fronts. Batting at No. 5 and adding much-needed balance to a young Derbyshire side, Critchley scored between 40 and 109 in his first six innings of the season; only three men have managed more than his aggregate of 483 for the season so far.As a result, Critchley was an obvious choice for the PCA’s Most Valuable Player (MVP) award for April, romping home with 61% of the public vote after earning a nomination alongside Craig Overton, David Bedingham and Ryan Higgins via points earned through the PCA’s algorithm – revamped for 2021, following input from CricViz and focus groups with players.His flying start will come as no surprise to those who saw him in the Bob Willis Trophy last summer, or to anyone who has heard his mentor, Stuart MacGill, wax lyrical about his potential as an allrounder since they got to know one another during an ECB spin placement in Sydney. Critchley was thrown into the Derbyshire side as a teenager, and at the end of 2019, his first-class averages were 28.05 and 49.55 with bat and ball respectively, but since then, they have flipped: they are now 51.21 and 29.65 respectively over the last 12 months.Related

  • Who's in the race to 1,000 runs before the end of May?

  • Critchley proves Derbyshire's point nicely

  • Archer tests his levers for Sussex second XI

  • Hemphrey's Glamorgan contract terminated as ECB stand firm

  • Conway to join Somerset after WTC final

“It’s been a nice start to the season, obviously,” he told ESPNcricinfo. “Not only to score the runs in April, but also to get the wickets – when you wouldn’t expect spin bowling to be quite as prevalent in these conditions – shows that the hard work I’ve put in over the last few years is hopefully coming off.”I played a lot of games when I was pretty young, and was probably a bit too young and inexperienced to have been playing. Mentally, I feel more established now: you play in more games and there aren’t as many situations that are new to you, and that you haven’t been in before. I’m pretty proud to get an award, especially at the start of the season.”Critchley’s personal success has not quite translated into results for Derbyshire, who drew their first three Championship games before last week’s defeat at home to Nottinghamshire, but it is clear that he is held in high regard at the club. Last summer he signed a contract extension that will keep him at Derby until the end of next season at least, in spite of interest from elsewhere.Having grown up playing for Lancashire’s age-group teams, Critchley was thrown into the deep end at Derbyshire weeks after signing an academy deal. “Parky was ahead of me,” he explained, “and Rob Jones bowled legspin and batted, just like I did, so there wasn’t really room for me. At 16 or 17, Derbyshire showed a bit of interest so I ended up playing a few games for the academy.”When I was 18, I went to New Zealand for the winter, came back, signed an academy contract, and two weeks later I played my first Championship game. I had some tough times early on – playing young when you might not quite be ready and you’re playing against guys that have been around for years is going to be tough – but I do try to remember how lucky I am to be playing.”Critchley walks off after making 109 against Worcestershire•Getty ImagesAnd after being stuck behind him in the Lancashire system, it is possible that Critchley will be competing with Parkinson for an England spot before long, with the ECB previously showing enough interest to give him opportunities for the Lions. “We both bowl legspin, which is a niche market in itself,” he said, “but at the same time, I bat in the top six for my county so I’d like to think we could play together. I don’t see it as competing against anyone else: I see a little niche spot for myself, if I can keep performing with bat and ball.”I’m 6ft 2in and I think that height is an asset for my bowling. Typically legspinners are a bit smaller, throwing it up and getting it down, whereas I can do that from higher so it doesn’t have to go up as much, which then helps with bounce and speed off the pitch. Just to be involved in the [England] conversation shows that I’m developing.”Along with Durham, Derbyshire are the first team to have a week off in the Championship, but Critchley is already looking ahead to their fixture against Essex on May 13. “I’m pretty excited to watch Simon Harmer bowl, and to pick his brains,” he said. “He’s the gold standard for spinners in county cricket at the moment so it’ll be good to come up against him and see how he goes about it.”There’s still a bit of that going on, even with everyone in different bubbles: after the Nottinghamshire game, Sam Conners and Ben Aitchison were speaking to Luke Fletcher and Stuart Broad, trying to pick the odd thing up. I spoke to Scott Borthwick after we played Durham, about batting in the top six and bowling legspin, and he was really good. Hopefully I can do the same with Rashid Khan in the Hundred – that’d be cool.”Critchley’s involvement in that competition – he earned a contract with Welsh Fire after missing out in the initial draft – is a reminder that he holds white-ball ambitions, too. “I’m definitely looking forward to it,” he said. “In the Blast, sometimes the England players might be around for a game or two, but in the Hundred I’ll be playing with and against international superstars.”Rubbing shoulders with them over a period of time will give me a good idea of what level I’m at.” On the basis of his early-season Championship form, the answer is a high one. Ahead of the 2021 season, the PCA reviewed its MVP algorithm, partnering with CricViz and gaining expert insights from the players themselves. The four players with the most points across a month are nominated for Player of the Month, before a public vote decides the winner. For more info, follow @pcaMVP or visit the PCA website.

'We've got the pedigree to win even if we haven't played too many Tests'

WV Raman, Hemlata Kala and Nooshin Al Khadeer look ahead to India Women’s return to Test cricket

ESPNcricinfo staff20-May-2021On the significance of two Tests in a year and the maiden pink ball Test
Raman: “The point is also about trying to sustain it. How many boards can sustain it is my question,” he told . “Maybe the top three-four can because it does take a lot of money as well, let’s not forget the commercial side of it. Even if three-four boards are interested in making the girls pay Test cricket, it’s fine, and we must try and give them back.Related

  • Ellyse Perry: 'The more Test matches we play, the better we are going to get at it'

  • India Women central contracts: Shafali Verma promoted, Ekta Bisht dropped

  • India Women to play their first day-night Test during Australia tour

  • Shiv Sunder Das named India Women batting coach for England tour

  • WV Raman bats for game-changer Shafali Verma in Tests too

“What it does is that it gives them the opportunities to play the hardest format of the game and once they start doing well, they will be hailed even more than they are today. Performing in multi-day games is considered the hallmark of a great player, and that’s how you really gauge players in men’s cricket today. If they play regularly, that also gives them opportunities and tests them in every respect. The other thing is it also helps them become better in terms of match fitness because playing hard cricket for four or five days is going to be tough if you’re not used to it. Once they start getting used to it, I’m sure they will also start enjoying it.”Al Khadeer: “The pink-ball Test will be a bit of a novelty because it’s a shot into the unknown for the Indian team, but traditionally India Women have done well when there’s been zero expectation. I remember, we went on that tour to England in 2006 and beat them in our first-ever T20I. We also won a Test on the same tour when no one expected us to. I’m not implying there aren’t any expectations, but we’ve got the pedigree to win even if we haven’t played too many Tests.”It’s exciting news for cricket fans and I can’t be happier for the women’s team. Playing a Test is the pinnacle of the sport and that is where your resolve, temperament and skills get tested. So, no better way to get tested than playing England and Australia in the space of a few months.”Kala: “It will encourage better and more professional approach in players across age-groups, and I think the multi-day format in our domestic cricket will also make a comeback over time. If Tests are to become a permanent fixture in India Women’s calendar, the best way to scout and nurture talent would be through the multi-day domestic completion. So, the BCCI reintroducing the Test format for India could have a positive impact on our days’ cricket in the domestic set-up.”How should the Test squad prepare for the pink ball Test?
Raman: “Getting a practice game now looks a bit impractical because there’s a lot of restrictions and you may not have perhaps a good side to form from the local talent available. It’s not just about playing a practice game, it’s also about being a reasonably good quality side. So, the best option would be to try and play as much as you can with the pink ball, try and practice with it, try and see what the bowlers need to do, get used to it in whatever number of days they have available. It’s the same for the batters as well, they’ve got to ensure that they get over whatever apprehensions and anxieties that they may have with the pink ball.”It shouldn’t matter because they should try and tell themselves that it’s a case of just playing a sphere with a piece of willow, that’s the best way to get into a game. And even if things go unexpectedly badly, they shouldn’t be too disappointed because the important leg of the tour is the one-day series, and they enjoy playing the T20 format, and this is a situation where they’re playing a Test match after nearly seven years, so it’s not easy. We’ve seen that the best of sides can be a little bit rough getting into a Test game after a long break. A long break can even be three-four months, so seven years is a long time. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose.”‘Now that Test cricket has been reintroduced, we will see specialists in the longest format also coming up’ – Hemlata Kala•Getty ImagesKala: “I’m certain the BCCI will do its best to give the players opportunities to get some preparatory experience with the pink ball before the Australia tour. The dynamics of playing with the pink ball are, no doubt, quite different to playing with the red or the white ball. A good way [to prepare for the day-night Test] would be to host intra-squad matches in India for the core pool of say, 30-35 players who might make the final squad. Once our players return from The Hundred, they could link up with the rest of the squad for the Australia tour in India and play a few warm-ups among them under lights with the pink ball. That way, it might be even easy to pick the best squad for the Test.”Al Khadeer: “As a batting group, we’re technically sound to counter the pink ball and its movement. We’ve got quality batters in Mithali [Raj], Punam [Raut], Harmanpreet [Kaur], Deepti [Sharma] and Smriti [Mandhana]. With the ball, there’s the experience of Jhulan [Goswami] to bank on. Rajeshwari Gayakwad is an excellent spinner and we’ve seen over the years how spin increasingly has played a big part. So, it’ll be a challenge for the Australians too against our attack. I think there’s a good balance.”Also, a lot of the core group are slowly adjusting to playing around the world. With the likes of Jemimah [Rodrigues], Radha [Yadav], Shafali [Verma], Harman, Smriti playing in overseas leagues, the experience they’ll carry will be invaluable. If they’re able to pass that on to the youngsters, it’ll be massively beneficial. They’ll also have an opportunity to understand their opponents when playing in the same team, so all these are great signs.”Does the revival of Tests bring more opportunities to fringe players?
Kala: “If you look at our ODI and T20I teams, we already have some players, like Mithali and Jhulan, who are already one-format specialists. Now that Test cricket has been reintroduced, we will see specialists in the longest format also coming up. Players on the fringes might also get a chance because everyone has different strengths and talents and those who may not have been deemed best choices for the limited-overs formats could stand a chance to get maiden call-ups or make international comebacks.”Al Khadeer: “Developing players for Tests, preparing them temperamentally, would mean we’re also able to produce players for the 50-overs format. From the time BCCI took over women’s cricket, we’ve largely been inclined towards the limited-overs formats because that is the direction the ICC believed in as far as promoting women’s cricket goes. Now, the addition of Tests is a welcome step and I hope we’re able to bring back the three-day format in the domestic calendar.”How will Tests inspire young girls to take up the sport?
Al Khadeer: “Just imagine watching Jhulan Goswami bowl in a Test at Perth or Shikha Pandey in England, how many youngsters may want to take up fast bowling. Imagine them watching a three-pronged attack or four-pronged attack set up batters by hooping the ball around. That’d inspire a change over time at the grassroots and motivate youngsters to take up the skill more.”

When and where can IPL 2021 be rescheduled to?

Late September and late November are the primary options that the BCCI can explore

Nagraj Gollapudi06-May-2021On Thursday, BCCI president Sourav Ganguly suggested that the 2021 IPL could be completed in a window just prior to the men’s T20 World Cup. That was the first public hint of the windows the BCCI is looking at for the rescheduling.At the moment India remains the host for the global event, scheduled to run from mid-October to November 14. But in the wake of the IPL’s postponement and uncertainty over how the pandemic progresses in India, the ICC could be forced to consider the UAE as the venue for its event.Related

'The world stops a little bit' – emotional Tim Seifert recounts Covid-19 experience

BCCI asks ECB to rejig Test series schedule for IPL window

The IPL 2021 team of the tournament (so far)

Sporting pitches, surprise omissions, and Chennai Super Kings' refreshing turnaround

England counties offer to host remainder of IPL 2021 in September

There are still 31 matches left in the IPL. Three weeks with multiple double-headers across a few venues are likely to be enough. That leaves two realistic options in 2021 in which the BCCI could complete the tournament, either side of the T20 World Cup. ESPNcricinfo examines the pros and cons of each.Late September windowWhere India, UAE or even England could play hosts at this time of the year. Given the course of the pandemic, the UAE remains a favorite, having conducted a largely incident-free IPL in 2020. And if the T20 World Cup is also played in the UAE, it eases the logistical challenges of players moving between bubbles.England could be an option given that India will already be there till mid-September for their five-Test series. Also, there could be a number of overseas players participating in England’s various domestic competitions, including The Hundred.ChallengeThe biggest challenge will be to squeeze the tournament in the limited time between the end of India’s England tour and the T20 World Cup. The fifth Test in Manchester is scheduled to end on September 14. Although the ICC is yet to announce the itinerary for the T20 World Cup, it is expected to start around October 16. Accounting for quarantine periods and warm-up games wherever the tournament is held, teams will be expected to start arriving around the end of September.After a long tour, the Indian players will likely want at least a week-long break. That would then leave just about under two weeks of free time before the teams head to the World Cup, although England’s players – a significant presence in the IPL – are scheduled to be part of tours to Bangladesh and Pakistan in October.Workload will also be a factor for India’s players as they face the prospect of a long Test series, then the IPL, and then the T20 World Cup one after the other.There are still 31 games to go in IPL 2021•BCCILate November windowWhere India or the UAE will be the two primary contenders at this time, and for the tournament to be played right after the T20 World Cup ends. Although if it is in the UAE, Abu Dhabi will not be available as it is scheduled to host the fifth edition of the T10 league from November 14.Challenge Franchises will be concerned about the unavailability of overseas players especially from Australia and England, who will be involved in the Ashes from late November. Virtually all the countries, including India, are scheduled to play bilateral cricket immediately following the T20 World Cup.India themselves are scheduled to host New Zealand for two Tests and three T20Is between November-December. Bangladesh, meanwhile, will host Pakistan for a series comprising two Tests and three T20s. Afghanistan will be in Zimbabwe from late November for a one-off Test, three ODIs, and three T20Is. South Africa and West Indies, though, will be free during that time.If India can defer the New Zealand series and manage to find replacements for absent Australian and England players, the November window might look a better fit for the BCCI.

We can't keep asking more of our stars, but with Joe Root in this zone, who would want it to end?

In-form captain has team-mates running out of superlatives and home crowd loving every moment

Andrew Miller14-Aug-20216:00

Root or KP – England’s greatest batsman?

We cannot keep asking more of our star players. That has been the message from the ECB high command in recent months – including on the eve of this Test, when Tom Harrison, the chief executive, insisted the board were committed to a “people first” policy, for the remainder of England’s summer campaign and, most significantly, on into this winter’s Ashes.”It’s no longer acceptable to go ‘once more unto the breach dear friends’,” Harrison said, with Covid restrictions foremost in his thoughts, but with England’s insane itinerary right up there at the top of everyone else’s. For despite such stirring rhetoric, there really is no other way. The reality for England’s cricketers, in the sport’s post-pandemic panic, is that every day is Groundhog Day, every next-biggest occasion ever is just another day on the treadmill.But just as Bill Murray discovered while hanging out in Punxsutawney, some days can still be better than others if you can find it within you to seize the moment. And when you’ve ploughed on for as long as Joe Root has, willing yourself to perform in empty echoing stadiums for months of bubbled-up existence, then to emerge into a sunlight Saturday of a Lord’s Test, in front of a packed and enraptured crowd, with your own family looking on from their box in the Grandstand … well, there couldn’t really be a more perfect stage for a masterpiece.Related

  • Stats: Joe Root reaches 9000 Test runs as superb 2021 form continues

  • Joe Root's flawless 180* helps England edge 27 ahead

  • India refuse to go on the back foot thanks to Mohammed Siraj, Ishant Sharma and Jasprit Bumrah

Root has had plenty reason to wave his bat in triumph in the course of his extraordinary 2021. But few milestone moments have dripped with more glee than his jab into the covers off Jasprit Bumrah, armed with the second new ball on Saturday afternoon. He scampered the single then veered abruptly towards his family in the stands, punching the air with a delirium that only the most devout can know.For Root isn’t just going to the well for England, time and time again. He’s living in the well. He’s so immersed in the day-to-day pressures of carrying the fortunes of his team that he’s become at one with his surroundings, at peace with the pressure of treading water for hours at an end, knowing that if he dares to stop swimming, everyone is liable to sink. Today he soared, and it was glorious.”Joe and I, when we were walking out, we were just smiling at each other,” Jonny Bairstow said at the close, after an innings of 57 that ended up being less than a third of his captain’s tally, but is still, remarkably, the only other half-century to have come from one of his team-mates this series.”How good is it to walk out on a Saturday at Lord’s, with one of your best mates?” Bairstow added. “That’s exactly what it was. Our partnership was about having fun while we were out there, and to have a full crowd back at Lord’s, with the new stand, with family and friends, was really special. That Lord’s buzz, or hum, or however you want to phrase it, was most definitely back.”Mohammed Siraj congratulates Joe Root on his unbeaten 180•Getty ImagesMuch like James Anderson’s first-innings five-for, hindsight confers an inevitability on Root’s magnificence that circumstance really shouldn’t allow. It was a point put to him in the lead-up to this match – as he opted once again to do his captain’s media duties two days out from the Test, in a bid to cocoon his game-brain and filter out the noise for an extra 24 hours.”How are you Joe?” was the gist of the final question, almost as an afterthought at the end of a 20-minute interrogation, featuring topics including the return of Moeen Ali and the wider failings of a team that had been outplayed in each of their first three Tests of the summer, the longest they’d been made to wait for a home victory since their struggles against Sri Lanka and India back in 2014.He insisted he was fine – but then so too, you suspect, did Ben Stokes last month, when he fielded that SOS after the white-ball Covid outbreak, and broke off his recuperation to lead out a squad of reserves. Today, however, Root offered up the most ringing affirmative he could muster, an innings so serene it was as though the solitude of his supremacy had bought even his classically tailored game an extra yard of response time.Soft hands, calm choices, unhurried strokeplay – at least until his white-ball savvy surged to the fore as Anderson got peppered in the day’s frantic closing moments. He barely presented a straight bat through the V at any stage of his innings, relying instead on nudges off his legs for the balls that veered too straight, and needle-threading judgement on his favoured off-side, which made a mockery at times of Virat Kohli’s attempts to bung up his options with a trio of short covers and two slips to check his dab to third man.And in keeping with the need to think happy thoughts to haul England through this summer’s predicament, Root’s running between the wickets was able to step up an extra notch once he had linked up with sidekicks in whom he could fully trust – Bairstow in the first instance, but Jos Buttler and Moeen Ali too, a trio whose white-ball world-beating counts for more than perhaps it ought to in the cramped confines of this itinerary. In the end Bairstow was bested by the short ball – a method he cannot really plan for when ruling the roost in one-day cricket – while Buttler and Moeen made just 50 runs between them. But they between scratched out half-century stands, and gave Root the ballast he needed to drag the match towards parity.None of this is sustainable. It’s barely even credible – much as in 2018, when India’s 4-1 losing margin was a travesty, it beggars belief that they are not already 1-0 up from Trent Bridge, and pushing for a second. But like a high-wire act over Niagara Falls, Root’s progress is both utterly compelling, and so inexorable, you start to believe he might just get to the other side without looking down.

“I run out of superlatives, to be honest”Jonny Bairstow marvels at the feats of his captain

For his achievements in 2021 are already sensational. In the course of this innings, Root first skittered past Graham Gooch’s former England record of 8900 Test runs, then pushed on past 9000 too, and at a younger age than anyone bar the one Englishman ahead of him in the run-charts, Alastair Cook.By the time he’d run out of partners on 180 not out, Root’s tally for the year was close to double that of any other batter in world cricket – 1244 to Rohit Sharma’s mid-match tally of 669 – and while England’s overloaded itinerary is a contributory factor, the comparison with his peers is even more revealing.By the end of England’s innings, Root had scored almost four times as many runs in 2021 as his next most prolific team-mate, Rory Burns (353), and more runs than the rest of England’s top six in this match combined.He’s made five of their six centuries this year, including each of their four 150-plus scores, and is only one shy of England’s all-time record of six in a calendar year. And, as if further proof was needed of the burden he has carried for his side, in this match he even had to see off two hat-trick balls in the same innings. His first ball came in the wake of Haseeb Hameed’s golden duck on Friday; and his 277th came 152 runs later, as Ishant Sharma started a new over, fresh from delivering Sam Curran his own first-baller.”I run out of superlatives, to be honest,” Bairstow said at the close. “He means a heck of a lot [to the team], like he does to English cricket.”To go into second place in the leading run-scorers in the history of the English game is very special, to pass 9000 Test runs in this game is extremely special, to score another 180 not out at Lord’s is great, isn’t it, and to see him in the form that he is, playing the way he is, it’s awesome to be out there with him, putting on partnerships with him, and enjoying every single moment of it.”And as a consequence, he’s on the brink of his masterpiece now. A year to stand comparison with any of the greats that have gone before. Richards in 1976, Ponting in 2005… even the most prolific of them all, Mohammad Yousuf, whose 1788 runs in his annus mirablis in 2006 included nine centuries in 19 innings. That’s as many as Root himself has now played, but he’s still got 12 more scheduled before the New Year. As might have been mentioned once or twice, England’s itinerary really is something else.But more immediately, Root’s got the chance to prove a point about his contemporary credentials. The mutterings in recent seasons were that he had slipped out of the fabled “Fab Four” of modern batting – his century at Trent Bridge last week had been his first on home soil since India’s last tour in 2018, notwithstanding the fact that his role in England’s World Cup triumph had caused a wavering in his Test focus.But now it’s Kohli who’s feeling the heat for his own relative dip in standards. In consecutive series against England in 2016-17 and 2018, he amassed the small matter of 655 runs at 109.16, and 593 at 59.30. Likewise, Steve Smith racked up 687 runs at 137.40 in Australia’s 4-0 rout in their last home Ashes in 2017-18; then followed that up with 774 more at 110.57.Root, right at this moment, has 353 runs at 176.50, with potentially seven more innings to come. The same, in fact, as his next most prolific colleague for the entire year. It may not be fair to expect Root to keep giving more to the cause. But when you’re in a zone quite like this, who would ever wish it to end?

Natarajan returns to his scene of emergence to relaunch his career

Back after knee surgery, the bowler is working on his strength training and variations for the second leg of IPL 2021

Deivarayan Muthu21-Sep-20213:48

‘I didn’t expect to play the T20 World Cup – you can’t get in without match practice’

Left-arm seamer T Natarajan is “confident” with his rhythm as he prepares to return to top-flight cricket in the second leg of IPL 2021 in the UAE, after undergoing a knee surgery in April. The 30-year-old had sustained the injury during the Australia tour and aggravated it during the first chunk of the IPL in India.”I was very happy coming into the [Sunrisers Hyderabad] team after a long time,” Natarajan told ESPNcricinfo. “Working with my old team-mates with that same feel made me happier. I made good progress by having a lot of bowling sessions at the NCA (National Cricket Academy) and that was helpful. So, coming from the [NCA], the first session in the UAE was slightly easier for me.”I think at the NCA, I didn’t have much control in the first two sessions, but once I kept bowling more overs, I kept improving and gained confidence from that. That preparation gave me the confidence that I can do anything at any time. I had a lot of bowling sessions at the NCA. After coming here [to the UAE], I worked on my strength training and also my variations with the ball. So, I’m confident going into the IPL.”Related

Washington Sundar to return to action with Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy

T Natarajan in isolation after testing positive for Covid-19

R Ashwin picked, MS Dhoni named mentor for T20 World Cup

T Natarajan undergoes knee surgery

Natarajan: 'If I make an error, I back myself to come back with yorker'

A fit-again Natarajan’s return comes as a significant boost to the Sunrisers, who are languishing at the bottom of the points table, with just one victory in seven games. Natarajan admitted that the pressure will be on Sunrisers to turn the tables, but he backed his side to hit the ground running in the UAE.”The pressure is always there,” Natarajan said. “If we start winning initially, there are chances that the table might change. Yes, the pressure is there, but we will go in with the motive of winning a number of games at the start.”Natarajan, however, won’t be in action in the T20 World Cup, which will also be hosted by the UAE, and Oman. India’s chief selector Chetan Sharma said that although Natarajan’s name came up for discussion during the meeting, his injury had pushed him down the pecking order. Natarajan himself said he hadn’t expected to make the cut, given his recent time on the sidelines. His last competitive game was for Sunrisers against Royal Challengers Bangalore in Chennai in April and he subsequently missed the Tamil Nadu Premier League (TNPL), which was also held in Chennai.”A lot of people have told me that I would make the [World Cup] squad, but I didn’t expect to be picked in the 15-man squad•Ron Gaunt/BCCI”I didn’t have any disappointments [at not being selected for the T20 World Cup],” Natarajan said. “I knew it was hard to reach there in a short period of time. A lot of people have told me that I would make the squad, but I didn’t expect to be picked in the 15-man squad. I knew I was coming back from injury; I hadn’t played competitive cricket for five or five-and-a-half months.”If maybe the [World Cup] selection was after the IPL, I would have had a chance to make the squad. You can’t expect to be picked in the squad without match practice. I thought of at least going [to the World Cup] as a net bowler. I had ambitions of being a net bowler, but I didn’t expect to be in the 15 at all. My mindset was just to recover from the leg injury, play the IPL, and the rest will happen automatically.”The quarantine in the UAE provided Natarajan a chance to reflect on his breakout IPL in the UAE in 2020. He emerged out of the bench that season and bowled 71 yorkers, which ultimately vaulted him into India’s squad across formats.”Last year I had a bit of fear and some confidence of doing well,” Natarajan recalled. “I had proven myself, and this year I’m more confident of doing well than I was in 2020 because I’ve learnt a lot by watching and practising with India players. I did think of my 2020 performances when I was in quarantine and mostly I’m very confident. Yes, I had a bit of fear last year, but I’ve overcome that and looking to focus on what I can do for the team.”Natarajan isn’t the only bowler from Chinnappampatti (Salem) in the Sunrisers camp this IPL. His protégé G Periyaswamy, who is bit of a TNPL sensation with his slingy yorkers, is travelling with the squad as a net bowler. Back in the day, Natarajan and Periyaswamy used to hop from one village to another in Salem, in share autos, to play tennis-ball gully cricket. Several years later, the pair opened the bowling for Tamil Nadu in the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy and now they are sharing dressing rooms at the IPL.T Natarajan will look to lift Sunrisers Hyderabad off the bottom of the table•BCCIDuring his injury-enforced break, Natarajan had also travelled from Bengaluru, where he was training at the NCA, to Chennai to watch Periyaswamy face up against V Gowtham, another product from Natarajan’s Cricket Academy, in the TNPL. Gowtham has also had a taste of the IPL, having been a net bowler for Chennai Super Kings over the past couple of seasons.”I’m very proud,” Natarajan said of Periyaswamy’s progress. “I was also very proud when we opened the bowling together for Tamil Nadu. It was a big deal for us – coming from a small village and opening the bowling for Tamil Nadu. As far as I’m concerned, that itself is a big achievement for us. He will get more experience by practising alongside myself in the IPL. He will get to know the IPL atmosphere – he was with KKR as a net bowler last year. That would have been a good experience and since I’m here with him now, he will feel more confident. If he keeps doing well in the upcoming Syed Mushtaq Ali, there are chances of him progressing to the next stage.”I was looking forward to watching the TNPL. Three of my academy boys were in TNPL sides this year – [G] Aravindh my Lyca Kovai Kings team-mate, V Gowtham (Madurai Panthers) and Periyaswamy (Salem Spartans). Aravindh didn’t get a chance to play, but we wanted to see the game where Gowtham and Periyaswamy faced each other. So, I planned with Jayaprakash (Natarajan’s mentor) (brother) and friends to come and watch them play for the first time in the TNPL. Looking from outside, it was a super feeling for all of us.”Natarajan is also excited at reuniting with Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who has had a strong influence on his career. “I’ve been with the SRH team for three-fours years. We’ve shared a lot of things with each other,” Natarajan said of his relationship with Bhuvneshwar. “When I didn’t get a chance to play for two years, he encouraged me that my chance will come, but advised me to keep working on my bowling without any expectations. He said he has also been on the bench, so asked me not to get disheartened.”Often at the nets, I ask him about the field setting and match-related inputs, he always tells me to go with what I’m confident about and not to worry even if that goes for runs. When I’m confused, I ask him for inputs and he has shared his experience. So, he has asked me to call him anytime. So, this journey with him I’m so happy.”Natarajan – and Sunrisers – will first run into the Delhi Capitals in Dubai on September 22. Natarajan carved out his own identity when he bowled yorker after yorker and kept nailing them against the Capitals in the league match in 2020. A lot has transpired since then and Natarajan is now back to the scene of his emergence, this time to relaunch his career.

Robin Uthappa: AB de Villiers shattered the ceiling of batting technique

The innovation we see in T20 batting today started with him

As told to Nagraj Gollapudi23-Nov-2021If you ask me to capture the beauty of AB de Villiers’ batting, this image stands out: he is standing outside leg stump, and as the bowler jumps into his delivery stride, AB gets into this semi-lunge position, going down on one knee, with his head and eyes still, watching the ball before he executes the stroke.The toughest part of that shot is to get into position and still watch the ball. A lot of times, other batters, like me, get into position and we are just playing the shot, but with AB, his head is still, his eyes are still, and he is tracking the ball.AB could control his head, one of the heaviest parts of the body, and keep it still while moving the rest of the body into position; that was one of his biggest strengths as a batter.Around the 2016 IPL, I sat down with him in Bangalore for a free-flowing chat on batting. I had been through my own transformation as a batter, including with my stance, set-up and technique. I asked him: what’s the most important thing while facing the bowler?Related

AB de Villiers 'took the game to another level single-handedly'

The audacity of AB (2015)

AB de Villiers – IPL's best striker and a death overs phenom

Hate to Love: Big little ABD

AB de Villiers retires from all cricket

One thing that he said stood out: “The minute he is in the last four or five strides of his run-up, what I’m essentially thinking about is watching that ball and keeping my head as still as possible.” He said that in passing, but for me, it resonated the most.AB made me understand that the most important thing with batting is to have your head and your eyes still at the point of delivery, no matter what your initial movement, set-up or technique is. By doing that, you are giving yourself the best chance to be successful at playing the ball well.It was in 2011, when he moved to Royal Challengers Bangalore from Delhi Daredevils, that AB’s transformation sort of started. That is when he began experimenting with angles on the ground. It was AB who made us all believe: man, this is possible. He just opened up the V to a complete 360, where you could use the whole ground.Since then, we have seen how batters have been able to work the ability to use the ground into their game to create their own variations. Like KL Rahul utilising the gap between fine leg and deep square leg and playing a pick-up towards long leg. He has refined it to the extent where we now recognise it as a trademark KL shot.I was surprised to see Virat Kohli, who is otherwise orthodox, play the ramp in Australia last year, but it’s testimony to how much batters today are thinking of what’s possible. We wouldn’t have seen the kind of angles Rishabh Pant has been able to create and utilise in international cricket if not for the likes of AB.Some of AB’s strokes were definitely premeditated, but at the same time, they were also driven by his gut. If he instinctively felt that a shot was available, he could quickly get into position and execute.He was obviously courageous and did get hit on a few occasions, but he was also extremely athletic: he knew how to fall down, how to roll. The reason he did so well, I think, is because he played different sports growing up: field hockey, rugby, tennis. That was a massive advantage as he was naturally athletic. My wife, Sheetal [Goutham], a former professional tennis player, once told me that AB gets into tennis-like positions, as if he’s about to play a forehand or receive a serve.Keep your head still, track the ball and send it along its way – it’s simple•Arjun Singh/BCCIOne of my three favourite AB innings is him denying Pune Warriors victory in 2012 when RCB needed 21 off the final over at the Chinnaswamy. Saurabh Tiwary hit the winning six, but it was AB who turned the match in a matter of three deliveries in an over – with two sixes and a four.Another favourite was his hundred against Gujarat Lions in a 200-plus partnership with Virat in 2016.But my best AB innings has to be his world-record hundred, against West Indies in Johannesburg in 2015. He came in in the 39th over. By then Hashim Amla and Rilee Rossouw had scored a hundred each, but they had taken nearly 40 overs to do it, and here comes AB, picking up a century in 31 balls. I have studied the footage of that hundred for hours together and it is a masterclass. One of the shots he played then sticks in my mind – it was a reverse sweep that ran behind point. It was like a reverse drag-flick from hockey. It’s not like others cannot do it; they can, but not with the consistency that AB could.During that innings he played my favourite AB shot several times: going down on one knee and utilising the whole area from the keeper to deep midwicket. That arc was once a safe haven for bowlers, who knew they could bowl hard yorkers into leg stump, especially at the death, and that not many batters would be able to hit them there. But after AB came into his own since 2011, that cushion was taken away gradually.That’s why I feel AB has played a pivotal role in the evolution of T20. He was among those who forced bowlers to find different ways to challenger batters. Now you see the knuckleball, the back-of-the-hand slower ball, a dipping slower ball, the wide yorker on off stump. Those have come about as a reaction to the kinds of innovations people like AB have produced.I see the passion AB has for the team when he’s batting. In his mind, at no point is he losing a game. No matter how impossible a situation might feel, he believes he’s still going to do it. That’s what made him so dangerous.And by doing all this, AB shattered the ceiling of batting technique. He proved that you don’t need to be bound by technique to be successful in cricket. The only element of his batting that was conventional was his stance, which was side-on. But the minute he got into position, he had all angles open to him.AB is the foundation on which T20 cricket has evolved. We can only thank him for that.

Ranking England's Australian nightmares

In nine completed Ashes tours since 1986-87, England have won one series and lost eight by thumping margins. But which have had saving graces, and which have been unmitigated shockers?

Andrew Miller18-Jan-2022Getty ImagesArguably the least-worst defeat of an enduringly sorry era, Alec Stewart’s Ashes tourists not only pulled off a truly stunning Test win in a finish for the ages at Melbourne, they might even have achieved the unthinkable and squared the series at 2-2 in the fifth Test at Sydney, had it not been for one of the most contentious umpiring decisions of the decade – when Michael Slater, whose 123 was more than two-thirds of his team’s runs in their second innings of 184, was reprieved on 36 by the third umpire, Simon Taufel – early proof, as if it was needed, that the introduction of technology would not signal an end to controversy.English griping about that let-off cannot deflect from the fact that, once again, Australia were by a distance the better side. But for a final-day thunderstorm they would have won, as usual, the series opener at the Gabba, and England were 2-0 down by Christmas after heavy defeats at Adelaide and Perth.Their batting, as so often, was flaky at crucial moments – with the honourable exceptions of Nasser Hussain and Mark Ramprakash, whose middle-order alliances would invariably be followed by dispiriting tail-end slumps. Mike Atherton, struggling with a back injury, was a shadow of his usual obdurate self, which encouraged Stewart, the captain, to dump the gloves and promote himself to open midway through the tour – a gamble that paid off with a maiden Ashes hundred at the MCG.The bowling was at times heroic, not least the tireless Darren Gough, who charged in all tour long, and Dean Headley, whose six-wicket spell at Melbourne would be the greatest moment of an all-too-brief career. But the non-selection of Andrew Caddick, and to a lesser extent, Phil Tufnell, robbed England of two vital attacking options in conditions that should have been tailor-made for them. They were deemed too high-maintenance by the dogmatic Stewart, who at least could be said to have run an unusually tight ship, even as Australia’s waves of excellence overwhelmed his selections.ESPNcricinfo LtdNasser Hussain is rightfully considered to have been one of England’s finest Test captains – hard-bitten, personally driven and tactically shrewd. But it was his misfortune – or perhaps his destiny, given the depths from which he helped haul his England side – to run into an Australian team that has perhaps never been bettered in Test history.All such considerations flowed into one on the first morning of the 2002-03 Ashes, when Hussain made a call for which he has, perhaps unfairly, become synonymous. After winning the toss at the infamous Gabbatoir, Hussain shocked the stadium by choosing to bowl first – and then watched helplessly as Simon Jones, his thrusting young quick, suffered a horrible knee injury after sliding awkwardly on the sand-based turf.And in Jones’ absence, England’s remaining bowlers were exposed to ridicule by the merciless Matthew Hayden, whose front-foot tub-thumping racked up 300 runs in the match, including 197 in the first innings as he and Ricky Ponting carried Australia to 364 for 2 by the close of an omen-laden first day.The subtext of Hussain’s toss call had been that he had no faith in his batsmen to withstand an Australian attack comprised of Glenn McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Shane Warne and Andy Bichel – with Brett Lee waiting in the wings to mug them later in the series. And sure enough, Hussain’s lack of faith would be amply justified by the end of that first Test – 79 all out in the second innings to seal a 384-run defeat.However, one man refused to be cowed. Michael Vaughan, England’s elegant young opener, added grit to his natural flamboyance to compile three sublime hundreds at Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney – each of them lit up by the quality of his pulling and cover-driving, so as to leave Australia’s bowlers with no safe length to attack.Unwittingly, Vaughan’s aggression and style laid the foundations of the strategy that would win back the Ashes, under his leadership, two years later. And, with McGrath and Warne absent for the fifth and final Test, England did head home with a consolation victory at Sydney. But that was as good as it got against, arguably, the best there’s ever been.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn many people’s eyes, Mike Atherton’s Ashes tourists epitomise the nadir of the “Tetley Bitter” era of English cricket – that gloriously inappropriate sponsorship deal that invited a perpetually bedraggled squad to endure predictable jokes about piss-ups and breweries with every new low. And so it was that the 1994-95 tourists came home with their tails between their legs – thrashed 3-1 in a series that exposed the gulf in expectations that had grown since Australia’s own dog days in the 1980s.In fact, some of the most humiliating moments of the tour fell outside of the Tests themselves. A pair of warm-up defeats against the kids of Australia’s Academy were particularly galling, as was the one-day squad’s failure to qualify for the final of the B&H World Series – Australia and their own second-string team competed for the spoils instead.But buried somewhere beneath a glut of damning headlines lay a competitive spirit that bubbled to the fore at unexpected moments. After a Shane Warne hat-trick had put Australia 2-0 up at Melbourne, no-one anticipated that England would boss a thrilling drawn third Test at Sydney, let alone win the fourth at Adelaide, with an unrecognisably patched-up team after a glut of injuries had done for several of their first-choice XI – not least the ebullient Gough, who announced himself as a star in the first three Tests before limping out of the series with a broken foot.Natural order was restored in the fifth Test at Perth, where a certain Glenn McGrath made his first telling Ashes blow by reducing England to 27 for 6 in their final innings. That scoreline was notable for the sad farewells of both Graham Gooch and Mike Gatting – their hefty reputations no match for the reality that this had been a tour too far for both.ESPNcricinfo LtdAn underwhelming walloping, if such a thing can exist. England were outclassed in every relevant department – embarrassed by a lack of pace compared to Australia’s rampant spearheads, incapable of matching the skill and accuracy of Nathan Lyon’s ever-probing spin, and shown up in the batting stakes by Steven Smith’s remarkable Bradman impersonation. His haul of 687 runs in seven innings included three extraordinary hundreds, the best of the bunch coming in rare adversity at Brisbane, when the series was fresh and England’s flaws had not been fully exposed.But Australia’s eventual ten-wicket victory at the Gabba unleashed a different narrative – one in which England claimed 58 series wickets to 89, and scored three centuries to nine. The visitors had their moments – bowling Australia out for 138 at Adelaide, and setting the early pace through Dawid Malan and Jonny Bairstow at Perth – but they were unable to exert anything resembling sustained dominance. Key personnel failed to produce anything approaching their best – most notably Moeen Ali, Stuart Broad and Alastair Cook, whose immense 244 not out on a dead deck in Melbourne could not atone for his technical evisceration at the sharp end of the series.What might the absent Ben Stokes have brought to England’s tour? He’d have stood his ground against Australia’s quicks, that’s for sure, and maybe even provided the hapless Joe Root with the foil he seemed to lack in reaching fifty on five occasions without once going on to a hundred. But it’s hard to argue that Stokes alone was the difference, even if, as the spectre at the feast, he created collateral issues for the squad when the ECB’s paranoia about player behaviour turned two innocuous nightclub incidents in Perth into headline news.In the grander scheme of things, however, England suffered from few friction burns as the size of their defeat became apparent. Arguably that was a tribute to some affable leadership from Root, who retained an impressive team unity in adversity. More worryingly, it was a suggestion that England had given their all, and had no-one to blame for their shortcomings.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe 2005 Ashes may have been a once-in-a-lifetime party for England’s players and fans, but for a once-in-a-lifetime team, it was an affront beyond compare. Australia’s determination to set the record straight after two decades of near-unrivalled dominance turned a hugely hyped Ashes rematch into a savagely one-sided revenge mission.It all started at Brisbane, where Steve Harmison’s jittery first-ball wide telegraphed the anxieties of an England team that was already missing three fundamental components of their 2005 champions. Michael Vaughan, the captain, and Simon Jones had both succumbed to knee injuries, while Marcus Trescothick’s breakdown during England’s warm-up match in Sydney cast another bleak shadow over the tour.But it was the second Test at Adelaide where Australia confirmed that England’s campaign was a lost cause. Resuming on 59 for 1 on the final morning, with a draw preordained and a foothold in the series established, England contrived to lose an unloseable contest, as Shane Warne inveigled his way into their collective psyche to instigate a shocking meltdown of resolve. Nine wickets tumbled for 70 as the office-workers of Adelaide downed tools to troop across the river and join in the gloating, before Mike Hussey led Australia’s final-session rampage to victory.And thereafter it was a procession, as Australia’s greats took it in turns to set the seal on their final Ashes as a team. Adam Gilchrist belted a 57-ball hundred to secure the series at Perth, before Warne said farewell to his Melbourne home crowd with a first-day five-for to make it 4-0. A week later, Warne and Glenn McGrath departed the SCG arm-in-arm, with Justin Langer also bowing out in that match, with glory secured and England crushed.ESPNcricinfo LtdExpectations had been heightened as Graham Gooch’s men headed Down Under after a remarkable nine months in which they’d achieved the unthinkable in beating the mighty West Indies in Jamaica, before wrapping up home series wins against New Zealand and India – the latter crowned by Gooch’s personal zenith, 333 and 123 at Lord’s.But in the final analysis of an unthinkably desperate tour, Gooch would memorably describe his team’s efforts as “a fart competing with thunder”, after being crushed 3-0 by an Allan Border-led team that was still light-years shy of the standards that Australia would attain in the coming decade, but whose professional standards and will to win were unimpeachable.Gooch, to be fair, wished for his England team to attain similar discipline, but his rather hair-shirted attitude to team culture was both ahead of its time, and anathema in particular to England’s star batsman of the tour, and generational Golden Child, David Gower.Their personal fall-out was epitomised by the Tiger Moth episode, a childish prank during an upstate Queensland tour game, but one that surely didn’t warrant a total sense-of-humour failure. Thereafter, Gower was a shadow of the flowing strokemaker who had charmed his way to two hundreds in the first three Tests. His crass dismissal on the stroke of lunch at Adelaide, caught in a transparent leg-trap off Craig McDermott with a thunderous Gooch looking on from the other end, became one of the defining moments of the series.Accidents and injuries undermined England’s challenge, not least Gooch’s absence from the first Test at Brisbane, when he was hospitalised with a septic hand. But ineptitude was England’s most devastating failing. Three devastating batting collapses contributed to each of their three defeats, none more abject than the cascade of wickets at the hands of Bruce Reid at Melbourne, when 103 for 1, and a lead of 149, became 150 all out and an eight-wicket defeat.ESPNcricinfo LtdAfter a protracted will-they-won’t-they in the lead-up to the tour, the first five-Test series to be completed under the shadow of Covid was a desperate and troubling anti-climax. England spent longer on the Gold Coast, in their rain-wrecked quarantine period, than they did in live Ashes action, as the urn was surrendered inside 12 days – not their fastest turnover in recent history, but quite possibly their floppiest challenge yet.The tone – as so often – was set by the very first ball of the series. Rory Burns walked across his stumps to be bowled round his legs by Mitchell Starc, and thereafter, England’s batting was poleaxed. The team failed to pass 300 in ten attempts, and was skittled for less than 200 on six pitiful occasions – including 68 all out in the series decider at Melbourne, where Scott Boland marked his debut with the preposterous figures of 6 for 7, and a final-day collapse of 10 for 56 at Hobart.Silver linings were as scarce as England’s fleeting hours of dominance. Jonny Bairstow made England’s solitary century – a brilliant mind-over-matter 113 at Sydney – while the indefatigable Mark Wood earned overdue rewards with a career-best 6 for 37 in the final innings of the series. Root, however, is still waiting for that elusive maiden hundred in Australia as he faded after a stellar 2021, while Stokes – a shadow of his 2019 self after hurrying back from a mental-health break – was thoroughly outmatched in the allrounder stakes by Australia’s rising star, Cameron Green.Four years on from an identical scoreline in 2017-18, England had clearly taken on board none of the lessons of that insipid campaign. Their selection was baffling – right from the omission of both Broad and Anderson on a Gabba greentop – while off-field reports of excessive boozing and substandard fitness levels harked back to the chaos of the 1990s.Australia were good – some of their spells of fast-bowling, particularly from the new skipper, Pat Cummins, were genuinely great – but England were powerless to make them sweat at any stage. Warner and Smith endured rare fallow series, but Marnus Labuschagne claimed Root’s No.1 batting ranking after surviving three dropped catches in his Adelaide century, while Travis Head and Usman Khawaja – with twin hundreds in a remarkable comeback at Sydney – were the unlikely stars in Australia’s middle order. More than a decade on from England’s last win Down Under, it was all becoming a bit easy.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe shocker to end all shockers. Barely three months after easing to a 3-0 home Ashes win, England were obliterated in body, spirit and scoreline by a vengeful and under-rated Australia team who were fed up of being branded losers. Mitchell Johnson epitomised this revolution of the disparaged, putting aside his miserable past Ashes record to put the fear of God into his stunned and ill-prepared opponents. England had started the tour with realistic expectations of completing their fourth Ashes victory in a row. By the end of two brutal routs at Brisbane and Adelaide, their second whitewash in three tours of Australia was all but assured.It wasn’t simply that England were outplayed – with the ball, Ryan Harris was barely any less immense than Johnson, while David Warner’s succession of second-innings ram-raids trampled their remaining resistance underfoot. It was the collateral damage that they endured which truly marked out this defeat as England’s most crushing for a generation.It started at Brisbane, where Johnson’s searing pace tipped Jonathan Trott, hitherto England’s bedrock at No.3, over the brink. It continued through to Perth, where Graeme Swann, their outstanding spinner, retired mid-tour citing an injured elbow. And it culminated at Melbourne, where Matt Prior, their heart-and-soul wicketkeeper, was dropped due to his collapsing form, before an infamous team meeting vaporised what little squad unity still remained.A prostrate three-day surrender at Sydney completed a sorry tour. But England’s annus horribilis was only just beginning. When Kevin Pietersen, their series top-scorer, was sacked by the ECB for reasons that they chose never to make entirely clear, a toxic post-mortem was set in motion that would destabilise the England dressing-room right the way through to an equally desperate World Cup in 2015.ESPNcricinfo LtdEngland’s struggles to compete in Australia over the years only go to show what a masterful achievement it was for Andrew Strauss’s men to win in Australia for the first time since 1986-87. Alastair Cook took the plaudits with a gargantuan haul of 766 runs at 127.66, as Australia were given an insight into what it must have been to be an Englishman throughout the preceding two decades.But even on that tour, punctuated as it was by three thumping innings wins, England had to battle for the ascendancy throughout the first three Tests. At Brisbane, they were gripped by stage fright on the opening day of the series, and conceded a first-innings deficit of 221 (before Cook turned the tables to stunning effect); at Adelaide, they won the Test handsomely despite the loss of Stuart Broad, who went lame mid-match with a side strain. And at Perth, they were routed by an inspired Mitchell Johnson (in a hint of traumas to come), to leave the series in the balance at 1-1 with two to play.But it was England’s refusal to panic, and their planning for every eventuality, that ultimately seized the day. They had insisted on three fully competitive warm-ups in the build-up to the Tests, which allowed them to parachute in battle-hardened replacements at critical moments of the tour – in particular Chris Tremlett at Perth and Tim Bresnan at Melbourne, who meshed seamlessly with James Anderson, the attack leader, whose 24 wickets included match-shaping spells in the first innings of all three wins.It was as complete an England performance as has ever been compiled on a tour of Australia. But it could so easily have unravelled from the outset. Proof that anything less than the best Down Under will invariably lead to disaster.This article was updated on January 10, 2018 and again on January 18, 2021-22 to reflect England’s two most recent Ashes defeats

Game
Register
Service
Bonus