Tail wags again for India

ESPNcricinfo staff01-Oct-2016Neil Wagner lured Jadeja into a hook to break the 41-run eighth-wicket stand, before Mitchell Santner nabbed Bhuvneshwar Kumar•Associated PressWriddhiman Saha survived the testing period, though, and began to unfurl some shots•Associated PressSaha brought up his fifty – his first in Tests in India – and received good support from No. 11 Mohammed Shami•Associated PressMatt Henry took an athletic outfield catch to dismiss Shami off Trent Boult’s bowling, as India were bowled out for 316•Associated PressAfter Shami trapped Tom Latham lbw for 1, Bhuvneshwar had Martin Guptill bowled for 13•Associated PressBhuvneshwar then had Henry Nicholls chopping on to reduce New Zealand to 23 for 3•Associated PressRoss Taylor and Luke Ronchi combined for a fighting 62-run fourth-wicket stand•BCCIRonchi contributed 35 of those runs, with five fours and a six…•BCCI…before Jadeja trapped him in front as New Zealand slipped to 85 for 4 just before rain caused a break in play•BCCIAfter the resumption, Bhuvneshwar took three quick wickets in fading light as New Zealand closed the day tottering at 128 for 7•BCCI

Babar Azam in elite company

A look at the batting records Babar Azam achieved during the three-match series against West Indies in UAE

Bharath Seervi05-Oct-20162 Batsmen to score centuries in each match of a three-match ODI series. Babar Azam became the second cricketer to achieve this after South Africa’s Quinton De Kock achieved the feat against India in 2013-14. Azam also surpassed de Kock’s record of most runs in a three-match bilateral series.8 Batsmen who have scored three or more centuries in consecutive ODI innings. Azam became the eighth batsman overall and third from from Pakistan, after Zaheer Abbas and Saeed Anwar, to achieve this feat. Kumar Sangakkara is the only player to hit four consecutive ODI centuries.2 Number of times Pakistan have whitewashed a series of three or more matches in UAE – both against West Indies. Before this, they had done the same in 2008-09.0 Players to have made their career’s first three hundreds in successive innings before Azam. For Pakistan, Inzamam-ul-Haq is the only other player to bring up his first two centuries in consecutive innings.349 Previous highest run-aggregate by a Pakistan batsman in any three consecutive ODI innings, by Saeed Anwar in 1993-94. He made 107, 131 and 111 in successive innings. Azam overtook his tally by scoring 360 runs in three innings – 120, 123 and 117. The record for most runs by a batsman in three consecutive innings is 411, by Rohit Sharma (264, 9, 138).3 Centuries by Azhar Ali – most by a Pakistan captain in ODIs. He went past Inzamam and Shahid Afridi, who made two centuries as captains in 77 and 34 innings respectively as compared to Azhar, who has batted in 28 innings so far.2013 Last time Pakistan put up two 300-plus totals in any ODI series or tournament, against Sri Lanka in UAE in a five-match series. In this series, they’ve made scores of 284, 337 and 308. This was only the ninth such series for Pakistan.6.23 Pakistan’s run rate in this series – their fourth-highest in any bilateral series consisting of three or more matches. Their previous highest run-rate in a series against West Indies was 5.37.21 Number of innings taken by a Pakistan batsman to score three ODI centuries prior to this. That record was set by Nasir Jamshed. Azam has now scored as many centuries in just 18 innings. He now has 886 runs, needing another 114 runs in next two innings to become the quickest player to 1000 ODI runs.2 Pakistan left-arm bowlers who have taken 100 or more ODI wickets. Wahab Riaz became the second to reach the milestone in this match. Wasim Akram (502 wickets) was the first to do so.

Afghanistan huff and puff to thrilling win

28-Sep-2016Tamim Iqbal made 20 before Mirwais Ashraf had him holing out to third man in the 11th over•Associated PressIn his next over, Ashraf had Soumya Sarkar skewing a catch to extra-cover for 20•Associated PressWhen Mahmudullah chopped on for 25, Bangladesh slipped to 111 for 3•Associated PressMushfiqur Rahim scored a brisk 38 before falling to the legspin of Rahmat Shah•Associated PressMohammad Nabi compounded Bangladesh’s woes by removing Shakib Al Hasan and Mashrafe Mortaza. He would finish with figures of 10-3-16-2•Associated PressRashid Khan took care of the lower-middle order with his assortment of googlies and sliders…•Associated Press… but debutant Mosaddek Hossain slammed an unbeaten 45 and added 43 for the last wicket with Rubel Hossain to lift Bangladesh to 208•Raton Gomes/BCBShakib Al Hasan dented Afghanistan’s chase with a two-wicket over – the fourth of the innings – to leave the visitors at 14 for 2•Associated PressMohammad Shahzad and Hashmatullah Shahidi then steadily resurrected Afghanistan’s innings•Associated PressBut Mosaddek Hossain struck off his first ball in his ODI career to lift the hosts again•Raton Gomes/BCBCaptain Asghar Stanikzai and Mohammad Nabi then added a 107-run, fifth-wicket stand to shift the momentum firmly in Afghanistan’s favour•Associated PressThree quick wickets, including that of Nabi’s for 49, made Bangladesh believe again as Afghanistan slipped to 189 for 7 in the 45th over, with still 20 required•Associated PressWith two needed off the final over, Dawlat Zadran hit the winning runs to seal a thrilling win•Associated Press

'What day is it? Where am I?'

Disorientation, coffee consumption, airline travel, bespoke cakes – it can only be a Twitter round-up

Alex Bowden25-Nov-2016Hello. Presume you’re here for the latest on Kevin Pietersen’s coffee-drinking, which seems to have become the main theme of this column.

Wait a minute. You’re not Kevin Pietersen. Although you do sound uncannily like him on this occasion.Let’s start again. This is what we should have opened with. We should have started with a bang.David Gower’s on Twitter and he’s brought terrible dad jokes!

It seems as if James Taylor may have goaded him into tweeting. And that’s not all he’s been doing, the mischievous scamp.

The two men appear to be building quite the relationship, with Taylor also introducing Gower to other new experiences.

Over on a rival channel, covering Test series taking place in Australia entails a certain amount of talking through the night. Graeme Swann needs to find a way to switch off.

Well, this is one way to unwind.

Or if that seems just a little too ridiculous, how about this?

Or, if it comes to the worst, he could always join legions of other cricketers in their favoured pastime.

No, if you really, truly want to relax, there’s only one thing to do: go round to Sachin’s where he’ll present you with a cake with your name on.

Somewhere in the world there is always a cricketer sharing strange details of their air travel.

Or being a bit too enthusiastic about an aeroplane’s ability to quickly and easily transport you from one place to another.

Normally people want to take selfies with cricketers – but cricketers now love air travel so much that they’re demanding selfies with airline staff.

Enough of this innovation. Let’s finish with a pair of good, straightforward, traditional in-flight selfies to bring us back to normality.

Smith equals Ponting's mark

Stats highlights from the first ODI of the Chappell-Hadlee series in Sydney

Bharath Seervi04-Dec-2016164 Steven Smith’s score in the first ODI of the Chappell-Hadlee series – the joint highest by an Australia captain. Ricky Ponting had made 164, against South Africa in the famous ODI at Wanderers in 2005-06. George Bailey is the only other Australia captain to score 150 or more; he struck 156 against India in Nagpur in 2013-14.1 Number of higher scores than Smith’s 164 by captains against New Zealand. Sachin Tendulkar scored 186 not out in Hyderabad in 1999-00. Overall, Smith’s innings is the fourth highest against New Zealand and second highest for Australia against New Zealand, after Matthew Hayden’s 181 not out. Smith’s previous highest ODI score was 149 against India at the WACA in January this year.232 Runs added by Australia for the fifth wicket and below – the second most for them in ODIs. Australia got 252 runs for the fifth wicket and below in Bangalore in 2013-14.1 Number of higher totals for Australia in home ODIs against New Zealand than 324 in this match. Australia piled up 113 runs in the last 10 overs at the SCG – 58 in four overs between the 43rd and 47th. They had scored 343 for 5at the WACA in 2006-07.162* The previous highest ODI score at the SCG, by AB de Villiers against West Indies in the 2015 World Cup. Smith beat that score and finished with 164. The previous highest score by an Australia batsman at SCG was Andrew Symonds’ 151 in 2005-06.2 Number of Australia captains to score 1000-plus ODI runs in a year. Smith became the second during this innings. Ponting was the first to do so in 2003, and he achieved it four times in all – in 2005, 2007 and 2009. Smith is the second player after David Warner to score 1000-plus runs in ODIs in 2016.4 Centuries for Smith as captain – the third most by any Australia captain. Ricky Ponting made 21 and Michael Clarke five. Smith’s average of 50.40 as captain is the highest among ten Australia captains with 500-plus runs.78.78 Smith’s average in ODIs at home in the last two years – the highest among 29 batsmen with 500-plus runs at home in this period. But in ODIs outside Australia, Smith has averaged only 35.63 in 24 innings – the third lowest among 21 batsmen with 750-plus runs.5 Number of New Zealand batsmen to complete 5000 runs in ODIs. Martin Guptill became the fifth to do so. He took 132 innings to reach the landmark – the quickest among the five New Zealand batsmen. He is the 10th fastest among 79 players who got to 5000 ODI runs.3 Number of centuries by New Zealand openers against Australia, Guptill’s 114 being the third. The other two are: Bruce Edgar’s 102 not out at MCG in 1980-81 and Nathan Astle’s 104 in Napier in 1999-00. This was Guptill’s second ODI century of the year, and his six sixes in this innings took his tally to 26 sixes this year, the joint most with Quinton de Kock.30 Wickets for Adam Zampa in ODIs this year – the most by any bowler. He went past John Hastings and Adil Rashid who have 29 wickets each.73 Runs conceded by Lockie Ferguson in this match – the most by any New Zealand player on ODI debut. Danny Morrison gave 69 against India in the 1987 World Cup.

Why your opening bowler in the BBL needs to be a spinner

There are lessons to be learnt from the success of Tom Cooper, Michael Beer, Samuel Badree (and Dipak Patel) at the top

Jarrod Kimber22-Jan-2017A good-length ball with little width flies towards the batsman at roughly 138kph. It’s the first ball of the innings. The batsman gives himself some room, it takes the outside half of the bat, flies past backward point, and third man runs around in vain. The bowler then slightly over-corrects for his next ball. The batsman guesses he might and gets inside the line, trying to beat short fine leg. Instead, all he gets is some thigh pad on the ball. It still beats short fine leg and the score is 8 for 0. The next three balls go to plan for the bowling team. The final ball of the over is in the channel outside off stump. It’s a good ball, but the batsman, emboldened by the early runs, throws his hands through the ball. It flies over cover point’s head – the third four of the over.The batsman has barely played a shot in anger, or a shot at all. All he has done is use the pace of the ball.

****

The first time Tom Cooper opened the bowling in a T20 game, he had no idea he was going to do it until he got out on the ground. “Down in Hobart last year, and we were up against [Ben] Dunk and [Tim] Paine, and Finchy [Aaron Finch] had this feeling that I could sneak an over in and get away with it. It went all right.” By “all right” Cooper means it went for two runs.A Cooper opening over is pretty standard. He’ll probably come around the wicket to both the right- and left-hand batsmen. His quicker ball will be hurled in an ungainly manner. The batsman will then get about five to six seconds to face the next ball. It will be short of driving length, or low and flat, at the toe of the bat.What started as a whim of Finch last year was continued this year, at first because Sydney Thunder had struggled against spin in their previous game. But now the tactic has become Cooper’s incredible invisible over.Melbourne Renegades are offering teams a 19-over contest since Cooper takes one over from the opposition for almost no runs, while also taking wickets.In each of the first seven games of this season, he bowled Renegades’ first over, and conceded 31 runs for three wickets in all. 1 for 4, 0 for 4, 1 for 5, 0 for 7, 0 for 1 for 4 and 0 for 6. Eoin Morgan, Luke Wright, Glenn Maxwell, Tim Paine, Rob Quiney and D’arcy Short are some of the batsmen who have faced his first overs, yet Cooper was going at 4.5 runs, and took three wickets from his first, and sometimes only, over.Sunil Narine and Brad Hogg, Cooper’s spinning team-mates, would be happy with his economy rate. Hell, Dale Steyn would kill for those numbers. But Cooper isn’t Steyn, he’s not even Jeetan Patel. At best, he’s a poor man’s Joe Root. He’s not a bowler. He’s not even an allrounder. If you’re kind, you’ll call him a part-timer. A club offspinner, Cooper wasn’t even used by Netherlands as a bowler in the last World T20. Last season for Renegades, he bowled three overs. The season before, he bowled none. Outside his opening overs, he has only bowled six more, three of them in his second-last game. He has gone for 50 runs in those six overs while taking two wickets.

The Dipak Patel move was seen as a fluke. His success, according to some, came because he took batsmen by surprise

He’s a part-time specialist opening offspinner. Not the first, but certainly one of the most effective. He is such a specialist that when Renegades needed a last over bowled against Perth Scorchers, with Dwayne Bravo injured, Finch didn’t turn to Cooper. Given the Big Bash teams do extensive research on each other, it is even more remarkable that Cooper has succeeded seven times.”You sort of know where guys like to hit,” says Cooper. “I try to do as little as possible. There is a bit of discussion about the fields, and I try to execute to the field.”One team took the Tom Cooper over seriously. They looked at his pitch map, showed it to their opening batsmen, and tried to get them to come up with a plan after some work in the nets. One of the things the openers were told was: You don’t need to run down the wicket. You know where the field is. Play your shots to the empty parts of the field. You know exactly what is going to happen before you get out there. Use that to your advantage.With all that information, Cooper still took a wicket when the batsman raced down the wicket at him. And he went for less than six runs. An invisible lethal over.”I probably see it as being lucky so far,” says Cooper.In his most recent match, Cooper had no luck, because he bowled to Brendon McCullum. The first ball was a quick short ball that gave McCullum no room. McCullum made his own and tried to slog the ball, which limped over mid-off. Had Cooper been lucky, it would have been caught. Instead, it went for two. The rest of the over, McCullum helped add 12 more runs.

****

New Zealand made 248 in the first game of the 1992 World Cup. David Boon and Geoff Marsh came out to bat, and Chris Cairns bowled the first over. Dipak Patel bowled the second over. Before that day, in 24 matches, Patel had only bowled his full quota three times. He had not bowled in four games. Patel was an offspinning allrounder.In that game against Australia, Patel took 1 for 36 in ten overs. In the next five World Cup games in which he opened the bowling, in ten overs each he took 1 for 28, 2 for 19, 0 for 29, 1 for 26 and 2 for 25. In the semi-final, for the first time, he went for any runs – 1 for 50. After the World Cup, where he had opened in seven out of eight innings in which he bowled, Patel did so another 17 times in his career.When a part-timer like Tom Cooper is doing well opening the bowling, why aren’t more spinners being given the new ball?•Getty ImagesIt’s weird that opening with a spinner didn’t become a wider cricket tactic. Martin Crowe’s mad brain had worked out that it would be hard to score quickly when you had two new batsmen starting against spin. But the Patel move was seen as a fluke, not a successful tactic that all teams could replicate. The new ball was too crucial for seamers. Other spinners wouldn’t like to bowl with it. Patel’s success, according to some, came through the fact that he took batsmen by surprise.In the first 26 matches of the 1996 World Cup, played in Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka, not one of the opening bowlers was a spinner. It wasn’t until Steven Lubbers of Netherlands opened in the 27th match, against South Africa, that the tactic was used once more in a World Cup. Patel opened only once in that tournament. His opening the bowling wasn’t a revolution. It was a novelty, a sideshow. And even when spinners opened after him, there were no specialists, and it didn’t happen often.

****

“I bowled pace until I was about 17. If someone told me when I was a kid that I’d be lucky enough to open the bowling for Australia, that’s the dream of every young kid who wants to bowl fast. And I got to do it in a Test as a spinner.”That is Michael Beer, the first spin specialist opening bowler in Australian cricket.”Even at club level, before I played it at the state level, I was opening the bowling in T20. It was due to my control of the white ball.”Beer has opened the bowling 30 times in the Big Bash. For someone to do it more, Beer would probably need to sit out about three seasons, maybe more. In those overs he goes at 6.09 an over. In the Powerplays he goes at 5.96, and outside it, 6.66. So the more fielders that go out, the worse (in relative terms, 6.66 is, as Cricket Australia would say, elite) he goes.”It’s all about playing the percentages,” says Beer, who has been with Melbourne Stars for three seasons now. “For me, in the Powerplay it’s all about whether I am trying to get the guy out, or am I wary of the bloke’s scoring shots, or am I trying to give him one to attack from the other end. You can work out pretty quick if the batsman is lining up to have a crack at you, or is he just trying to get up the other end.”

“I’ve been in a few auctions and never been taken. Most of the overseas competitions are based on fast bowlers and power-hitters, and that’s where the money goes”Michael Beer

Beer hasn’t been lucky. Since he was a fast bowler, he can pump up the pace a little bit. Then there’s his consistency. He bowls quick, well-placed fingerspin in the right place almost every ball. But his secret weapon is video analysis.”My whole T20 game is based on match-ups and game plans against individuals. I have always used video and looked at my footage. I know where the batsmen are going to hit me the majority of the time. I know what’s coming before I bowl it, and I strategise around that, so that I can go to a captain and say, ‘I match up well against this bloke.’ If I don’t do my video analysis and have plan A, B and C against each batsman, I wouldn’t be as successful as I’ve been.”Not that he doesn’t adapt his plans. “From ball to ball, day to day, it varies. We all know taking wickets in the first six makes a big difference. There are guys you know [against whom], if you do restrict runs, you are more likely to get them out. It is all about summing up the conditions and the player you are against and then executing the right ball”.Beer has been so successful in his plans that Renegades tried something new against him this year. “The opposition are now getting better. We saw Sunil Narine come out [to bat] just to target me.”For all the targeting, Beer’s first over went for only eight runs, and overall his three Powerplay overs for 22. In Stars’ next game, against Renegades, Narine opened the batting again and hit Beer for a six in the first over. In his 372 balls in the Powerplay, it was only the fourth six Beer had been hit for.”They used to try to get through a couple of overs of what I bowled and not get out to me,” says Beer. “It feels like they are coming at you for the whole 20 overs now, compared to when the BBL started. Now they think, well, these are important overs, let’s attack him with someone other than our normal opening batsmen. I am a little bit surprised that it has taken so long for a specialist pinch-hitter to face me. But on the other hand, we could turn around and bring on the fast men.”An economy rate of 6.3 in T20 cricket is obscenely good. Beer’s figures are as good as Samuel Badree’s, and better than those of Narine, Daniel Vettori and Johan Botha in the Big Bash. But unlike the others, the Big Bash is Beer’s only league.”I’ve been in a few auctions and never been taken. Most of the overseas competitions are based on fast bowlers and power-hitters, and that’s where the money goes.”But if the other team has all these power-hitters? Isn’t someone who has spent the last few years stopping them just as important? Also, unlike Adam Zampa and Brad Hogg, who have both been successful in home and away leagues, Beer can bowl in all three phases of the game – the Powerplay, the middle overs and the death. Hogg has bowled only one Powerplay over in the entire Big Bash; Zampa none.”I’ll never say never, and I’ll keep going in auctions, especially for the CPL and PSL, but for the IPL, I think there are so many Indian spinners who are world-class, so I would struggle to get on a list there,” says Beer.Samuel Badree: “I have a very low trajectory, with a collapsed front arm that helps me to achieve some level of consistency, which contravenes conventional thinking”•IDI/Getty ImagesIt is the IPL where Beer could be most handy. Without the need of being played for every game, he could just be chosen for certain pitches or match-ups. If he had success, he might become a regular. If you’re playing a team with Virat Kohli, AB de Villiers, Chris Gayle and Shane Watson in the line-up and you need an extra spinner, Beer coming off the bench is better than an inexperienced player being sent to the wolves.If cricket was smarter, Beer would be a franchise player around the world. Instead, he’s the guy who has never left Australia to play. And though the last three World T20s have been in Asia, not only did he not play in any of them, he has never played a T20I for Australia. Apparently he does his job so well that no one even notices.

****

Seam bowlers who have opened in this year’s Big Bash have been going at 7.89 an over, the spinners at 6.2. There has only been one season of the Big Bash where spin bowlers weren’t less expensive at the top of the innings – 2015-16, where the fast bowlers went at 6.65 and the spinners at 6.7. In the 2011-12 season, spinners went at 5.15 an over, the quicks at 6.8.In the Powerplay overs this year, seam bowlers have been going for 8.67 an over, the spinners at 7.38. In 2012-13, spinners went at under six an over in the Powerplays. That was the only season in which the seamers went for less than seven an over – 6.99.When it comes to wickets in the first two overs, over the history of the Big Bash, seamers average 29, spinners 32. In all the Powerplay overs, seamers average 30, the spinners 34.The spinners are harder to hit, are marginally worse at taking wickets, and yet they only bowl 21% of the balls in Big Bash Powerplays. Even in the opening overs it’s only 25%. Part of this is to do with the reason Beer isn’t travelling around the world playing franchise cricket, and why Badree still gets the wickets of batsmen who underestimate him: spinners are still not seen as proper opening bowlers.But it’s also because it’s hard to open the bowling as a spinner. Jon Holland and Jason Krejza both go for over eight an over when they bowl in the Powerplay. David Hussey is a useful T20 bowler as long as he isn’t bowling in the Powerplay and going at 8.3 an over. Even Nathan Lyon, who first made his name as a T20 spinner, is nowhere near as effective in the early overs. Still, because of Badree, Ashwin, Botha and Beer, more spinners are being tried at the top of the innings and are succeeding.Not just part-timers like Cooper and Travis Head, but spinners like Clive Rose. Outside the Powerplays, left-arm spinner Rose is a disaster at 9.5 an over. Inside them, he’s a handy 7.4. Steve O’Keefe, another left-arm spinner, is brilliant in the Powerplays, at 5.7, and handy outside, at 7.2. Botha and Vettori are the same – better bowling with two men out than with five men out.And yet, despite their success, it’s still rare for teams to bowl as much spin in their Powerplay as pace. But then it was only recently that people stopped mentioning how novel it was to open with a spinner.

****

Badree started opening the bowling as a spinner when his club’s fast bowlers were injured. He did so well that he was chosen to open the bowling for Trinidad and Tobago in the Stanford T20 and picked up 3 for 6 from 3.5 overs.

Spinners only bowl 21% of all balls in the Big Bash Powerplays. Part of this because spinners are still not seen as proper opening bowlers. But it’s also because it’s hard to open the bowling as a spinner

It isn’t unusual for West Indies to have great opening bowlers, but to have a legspinning opening bowler is quite unorthodox. And Badree is unorthodox even by legspinning opening-bowler standards.”My unique style and grip is quite different from traditional legspinners,” he says. “I have a very low trajectory, with a collapsed front arm that helps me to achieve some level of consistency, which contravenes conventional thinking.”It is contravening conventional thinking that Badree does best. He has opened the bowling in T20 cricket 122 times in his 149 bowling innings. R Ashwin and Shakib Al Hasan are second and third on the list, and he has done it more than both of them combined. Badree is the world’s only globetrotting franchise T20 legspinning opening bowler.While he does prepare for batsmen he hasn’t faced before, Badree isn’t an analysis fiend. “I have always got different plans, but at the end of the day, you deal with what is before you, which, in many cases, is quite different from what you planned for. Thinking on your feet then becomes critical.” What Badree does is incredibly subtle, skilful and deceiving.”I think it’s the fact that batsmen underrate what I do, and that they don’t see me as a threat, someone with great variety or a huge turner of the ball. That gives me a slight advantage, as they don’t prepare. I also have good control and quite often attack the stumps, which increases the probability of taking a wicket.”It’s not just batsmen who underestimate him. For someone with a record as incredible as his, Badree has played for almost as many IPL teams (three) as he has played IPL games (five), which is weird, because what team wouldn’t want the chokehold he puts on in the Powerplays? Plus, he takes wickets. Wickets in the Powerplay are like gold. Once you get three, you have a 70% chance of winning. In the Big Bash Powerplays, Badree averages 12.He is not as good outside the Powerplays. Like against New South Wales in the 2009 Champions League, where he bowled only one over.”What happened in that game was that I was introduced after the tenth over or so, very strange to me at that point, and was hit for about 24 runs in an over by the set David Warner. I bowled that over the same way I would have with a new ball, but that was my mistake. Learning experience.”Outside the Powerplays, Badree experiments more. In the Big Bash, outside the Powerplay, he is going at seven an over, but generally, by the time he finishes his first three overs in the Powerplay, his fourth over is not as important. His economy rate for his 152 T20 matches is 5.62.With that record, teams have treated him much the same as Beer. “I have been involved in games where the opposition used a match-up and sent a left-hander to just swing for the hills. It’s quite funny, though, because most times the captain then just doesn’t open with me.”Badree was a teacher, and is now a curriculum officer for physical education and sport in the ministry of education in Trinidad. “I love to see others reach their full potential,” he says. Few players in the world have used more of their potential than Badree. “I think I have a responsibility give back to the education system in Trinidad because so much was given to me, and also to promote the sport of cricket as much as I can because of what this glorious sport has done for me. I never dreamt that I would win a World cup, I now have two. I never dreamt I would open the bowling, especially as a spinner in the West Indies; I now have opened in every single game that I played.”He has already given back. Whether people ever actually said spinners were going to die a death because of T20 cricket or not, Badree has not only proved that straw man pointless. He has literally opened up new possibilities for spinners.

****

“I almost missed the wicket against the Sixers and still went for four in the first over,” says Cooper.”Sometimes in the first over it’s a bit slippery”, admits Beer, “I don’t know what is coming out sometimes. Sometimes that makes it harder for the batsmen, or vice versa, sometimes the batsmen are aware of that.”Despite those problems, Cooper and Beer, and others like them, are taking over the first over and the Powerplay in T20s.But why?”I don’t know. With pace on the ball, it sort of flies off the bat, and with the field up, it can just run away,” says Cooper. “If you think about the first over, it’s one of the easiest overs to bowl because you have two new batsmen.”Beer is also unsure. “I’m not sure. Maybe it’s still because the opening batsmen are so used to facing quick bowling.”Badree agrees. “I think because opening batters are so used to facing fast bowling, it takes a bit longer to adjust to the pace. Spinners usually have crowded fields, and thus less space to rotate the strike, so it’s either a dot or a boundary, which may be risky.”Beer also believes that quicker bowlers are getting hit more. “As you look at this tournament, the quicker you bowl, the further you go. Look at guys like Chris Lynn hitting the quicks.”When asked why spinners did so well at the top, Beer says “I’m not sure” three times. Then he gives three less-than definitive answers. It was the interview version of the opening batsman facing a spinner in his first over. He wants to smash the ball, but mistimes the first one for a single, then over-complicates it for the second ball, before swinging widely and missing the third. In the end, he’s happy to get out of the over at all.And while that keeps happening, the spinners will keep opening the bowling.

Starc injury renews focus on front-foot law

Is it time to revisit the front-foot no-ball law and the extra stress it puts on fast bowlers’ bodies? There is some evidence to suggest as much

Daniel Brettig15-Mar-20171:21

Is the front-foot rule causing injuries?

Mitchell Starc is perhaps Australian cricket’s most prized asset. His bowling action, fitness and workload are all managed with the utmost precision by Cricket Australia’s extensive team performance and sports science divisions. His appearances in the IPL have been duly limited. And at 27 he is at the point of physical maturity where all CA’s research suggests he should be at his most durable.But after two Test matches in India where he was called upon to bowl a mere 42 overs, having been rested from the tour game that preceded them and from training on the eve of each match as is Australia’s team custom, Starc still found himself flying home early. Why? The diagnosis of a stress fracture in his front foot at the bowling crease.Starc is at the end of a long summer, and he strained every sinew to keep Australia in the Bengaluru Test. Nevertheless, there remains a sense of some disbelief that Starc, with all that management and all that money spent, could break down at such a key juncture – his side’s chances of winning the series have dropped considerably.What, then, if the injury to Starc had less to do with his workloads, his management by CA or plain old rum luck, than with a change to the laws of the game dating back to 1963, some 27 years before he was born. That is the provocative theory behind a book called by the Australian journalist Doug Ackerly. Starc’s absence from the final two Tests of the Border-Gavaskar series will only add to interest in this contention.The move from a back foot to front foot no-ball law was advocated on the premise that the technique of “dragging” the back foot meant that taller or suppler bowlers could deliver from far closer to batsmen than others. What followed was a fundamental change in fast bowling technique to emphasise a leap in a shortened delivery stride that slammed the front foot down with force that added enormous strain to the feet and backs of all those so obliged.For many years, opposition to the front-foot law from the likes of Donald Bradman and Richie Benaud was based on the view that it had removed from batsmen the advantage of hearing a no-ball call early enough to take advantage of the bowler’s error, while also greatly adding to the difficulty of an umpire’s work. But Ackerly’s addition of the physical dimension and link to injuries has undoubtedly brought a greater level of urgency to the question.Certainly some key researchers believe that the front-foot law should be re-examined in the context of its physical toll, most particularly on the harder pitches of Australia. Doctor Marc Portus, a former head of sports science for CA and now the head of movement science for the Australian Institute of Sport, told Ackerly that the technical change ushered by the front-foot law had a strong chance of increasing stresses on foot and back.

Research has quantified the amount of strain placed on a bowler’s body by the gather, leap and landing at the front line over 20 years of tests: an average of seven times regular body weight through the front foot.

“There’s no doubt, if you make someone stop quicker, there’s more braking force, there’s more impact force,” he said. “So, I definitely see where you’re coming from and there’s some plausibility in your theory. And, it could be an important factor.”Portus’ AIS research has quantified the amount of strain placed on a bowler’s body by the gather, leap and landing at the front line over 20 years of tests: an average of seven times regular body weight through the front foot, and up to five times regular body weight at back-foot landing over these years of testing. At the extreme end of the scale, one fast bowler weighing only 68kg put up to 13 times his body weight through his front foot at the moment of impact.Two other voices heard to raise concerns about the front-foot law are the late Bob Woolmer, who devoted an extensive passage of his posthumously released 2008 book to blaming the law for a raft of injuries to pace bowlers. “The reason is simple: since all bowlers have to cut the batting crease with their delivery stride, it means that they all land in and around the same place on the wicket as they get into their action,” he wrote.”The landing area quickly becomes dented, then rutted, and finally concave. Bowlers must then either avoid this hole in the wicket, or must bite the bullet and land in it. Either way, they are forced to change the angle at which their foot is landing, thereby creating different forces in the body.”Shaun Pollock, who was coached by Woolmer with South Africa, reached a similar conclusion in conversation with Ackerly. “The biggest injury problems that bowlers had in my era was their front-foot ankle,” he said. “With everyone landing in the same place, massive holes were created on the popping crease.”This meant that, at delivery, where the largest force goes through the body was where the bowlers were off balance. Prior to the introduction of this law, bowlers could drag their back foot across the back crease, taking pressure off the front foot, as well as opening up a far greater landing area for their front foot.”There are of course some questions to be asked of Ackerly’s research. The change in laws coincided with a rise in documented studies of bowling and its physical toll, leaving a major empirical gap from the era in which the back-foot law was in place. The case for the old thus relies largely upon anecdote and fallible human memory of its benefits and drawbacks: its proof beyond doubt requires testing of back-foot bowling technique, characterised by side-on actions and a softer front-foot landing, in a controlled environment to measure relative stresses on a bowler’s body.Yet the preponderance of foot and back injuries among pace bowlers over many years since the early 1970s certainly lends itself to the commissioning of that very research. So too does the fact that greater care in all areas of fast-bowling management has led to a significant drop in soft-tissue injuries to hamstrings and groins, but had less of an impact on fractures.Another point of intrigue is the experience of Simon Taufel, one of the game’s contemporary guardians of the laws via roles with both the ICC and MCC. As a young fast bowler in Sydney club cricket, Taufel was ushered into premature retirement from the game – and into umpiring instead – by a back injury. Years later, his teenaged son experienced similar pain.”If you can demonstrate to us that a change in the law would provide an environment where you could significantly reduce the amount of injuries, and particularly back stress injuries to bowlers, then the game needs to take notice of that,” Taufel told Ackerly.”I think the administrators and the lawmakers would take notice of that. Because, at the end of the day, it’s just a line. Now, whether it’s a line at the back or it’s a line at the front, as long as there’s a line, and everyone’s playing by the same line, it’s no big deal to me. And, if it means that we’ve got less kids and less players having injuries, then that has got to be a good thing.”Starc, for one, has flown home with plenty of reason to be open-minded about change.

The underdog's day out

IPL auctions have always thrown up a big surprise or two. Today’s countdown looks at ten unheralded talents whose prices shot through the roof

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Mar-2017David Wiese, bought by Royal Challengers Bangalore for INR 2.8 Crore in 2015Base Price : INR 30 LakhsAmong those to have come into prominence in the post-Kallis era, David Wiese toiled for long in South Africa’s domestic circuit. His impressive performances for Titans earned him a regular spot in the national T20 side. His efforts did not miss the eye of the IPL scouts, it seemed, as he landed a blockbuster payday at the 2015 auction. He backed it up by finishing as Royal Challengers’ fourth-highest wicket-taker, with 16 scalps in his debut season, apart from scoring quick runs lower down the order.M Ashwin, bought by Rising Pune Supergiants for INR 4.5 Crore in 2016Base Price : 10 LakhsA long-time net bowler for Chennai Super Kings, Ashwin was coming off a successful Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy when the auction took place. With the suspended Super Kings’ brains trust having shifted base to Rising Pune Supergiants, Ashwin’s bag of wickets in the domestic T20 tournament convinced captain MS Dhoni and coach Stephen Fleming to go all out for him in the bidding war. He finished with 7 wickets from 10 games, and his services have since been acquired by Delhi Daredevils.Pawan Negi, bought by Delhi Daredevils for INR 8.5 Crore in 2016Base Price : 30 LakhsThe IPL’s most expensive uncapped player ever, Negi’s solid limited-overs domestic season made him a part of the India squad as a backup spinner during the World T20. A left-arm spinner who can also score quick runs, he had been used as a pinch-hitter by Super Kings in earlier seasons. However, Negi could not live up to his hefty price tag, finishing the 2016 season with 57 runs at less than a run a ball, apart from one wicket in eight games.Dan Christian, bought by Deccan Chargers for INR 4.1 Crore ($ 900,000) in 2011A lower middle-order batsman who can hit the ball a long way, as well as a genuine wicket-taker, Christian’s consistent performances in domestic cricket had put him in the Australia T20 squad when he was picked up by Deccan Chargers in 2011. He delivered with both bat and ball, picking up 11 wickets to go alongside 190 runs in 14 games. A move to Royal Challengers followed, and after three seasons out, he is now back in the tournament with Supergiants.Despite being bought for a hefty price, KC Cariappa played only one game for Kolkata Knight Riders in 2015•Kolkata Knight RidersKC Cariappa, bought by Kolkata Knight Riders for INR 2.4 Crore in 2015Base Price : 10 LakhsCariappa shot into the limelight after a handful of games for Bijapur Bulls in the Karnataka Premier League. He got his IPL break courtesy the Bulls analyst, who also happened to work for Kolkata Knight Riders. After a trial, the legspinner from Coorg had a dream auction, but he only played one game. He was picked by Kings XI Punjab the following season and picked up three wickets from five matches, leaking 9.35 runs per over.Tyron Henderson, bought by Rajasthan Royals for INR 3.2 Crore ($ 650,000) in 2009Base Price : $100,000 (INR 50 Lakhs)Henderson’s IPL jackpot came on the back of an impressive county season with Middlesex, apart from his reputation as a big hitting all-rounder in South African cricket. Rajasthan Royals, who have an eye for lesser-known talent, secured his services for a whopping $650,000. In an auction that had franchises hunting for bargains, Henderson’s purchase price came as a surprise.Sunil Narine, bought by Kolkata Knight Riders for INR 3.5 Crore ($700,000) in 2012Base price : $50,000 (INR 25 Lakhs)Narine had played a handful of limited-overs internationals before the 2012 auction, when Knight Riders were keen to start off on a clean slate after a series of middling seasons. At the insistence of newly-appointed captain Gautam Gambhir, the franchise went all out to get Narine. He responded with 24 wickets – the second-highest of the season – at a stunning economy rate of 5.47. It played a big part in Knight Riders lifting their maiden title and Narine was named Player of the Tournament. In retrospect, five seasons on, the most economical bowler in IPL history still seems a bargain, even at that price.Krunal Pandya’s purchase price, after almost a year out of competitive cricket, surprised many•BCCIKrunal Pandya, bought by Mumbai Indians for INR 2 Crore in 2016Base price : INR 10 LakhKrunal had been out of competitive cricket for over a year when Mumbai picked him up for 20 times his base price. Just the year before, his brother Hardik had gone for INR 10 Lakhs to the same franchise. Krunal became one of the surprise packages of the season, and made crucial contributions with bat and ball. He has been retained by Mumbai for the 2017 tournament.Mohammad Siraj, bought by Sunrisers Hyderabad for INR 2.6 Crore in 2017Base price : INR 20 LakhSiraj had an excellent domestic season that culminated in the Inter-State T20s, where he took nine wickets and proved miserly with an economy rate of 6.57 after five matches. His ability to adapt to all formats and put in clutch performances resulted in a mini-bidding war. He was eventually snapped up by his home franchise, and is likely to partner Mustafizur Rahman this season.T Natarajan, bought by Kings XI Punjab for INR 3 Crore in 2017Base price : INR 10 LakhA whippy left-arm medium pacer with a deadly in-swinger, Natarajan grabbed eyeballs during his stint with Dindigul Dragons in the Tamil Nadu Premier League. In a Super Over against Tuti Patriots, he delivered six consecutive yorkers as his side successfully defended 12 runs. More recently, Natarajan was one of the stars in Tamil Nadu’s run to the Ranji Trophy semi-final. With such consistent performances, he made it hard for IPL franchises to ignore his talent, and was eventually bought for 30 times his base price.

Pretorius's fingertips, Buttler's reverse pull

ESPNcricinfo present the Plays of the Day from the second ODI between England and South Africa at the Ageas Bowl

Alan Gardner at the Ageas Bowl27-May-2017The half-volley
In search of a score after patchy returns from his last few outings, Jason Roy was feeling his way into the second ODI when Kagiso Rabada, starting his third over, pitched the ball up. It was, according to TV graphics, fractionally short of yorker length and, to a batsman as instinctive as Roy, therefore a designated half-volley to which he could deploy his trademark whip through midwicket. Except, this was a ball delivered at 93mph. A straight bat may have saved him but Roy was slightly out of synch playing across the line and immediately heard the death rattle behind him.The bar of soap
Keshav Maharaj, South Africa’s debutant spinner, had precious little assistance from his team-mates after coming on during the second Powerplay. Having seen Hales dropped for six by Rabada at long-on in Maharaj’s second over, Ben Stokes was then given two lives from his first two balls. The first saw him edge straight through the hands of Hashim Amla at first slip, with the ball running away for four; then a harder chance evaded the gloves of Quinton de Kock. Stokes’ slippery start continued as he nicked his third delivery wide of Amla for more runs – and Maharaj’s wait for a maiden ODI wicket went on.The fingertip intervention
Dwaine Pretorius was twice hit to the boundary in his first over, with Joe Root seemingly keen to tuck into his medium-pace offerings; in the next, with the wicketkeeper standing up, Root scooped and flicked two more fours. But Pretorius then had Hales well held at the wicket by de Kock and he saw off Root, too, when diving to his right to deflect an Eoin Morgan drive into the stumps at the non-striker’s end. It was only a brush of the fingertips but enough to leave Root stranded and having to dejectedly drag himself away from the middle.The reverse-pull
England were beginning to step up the pace in the final overs when Jos Buttler collared Andile Phehlukwayo for four fours off four legitimate deliveries (with a wide thrown in as well). The third was audacious enough to draw audible gasps of appreciation from the crowd, as Buttler stood up on off stump and reverse-pulled a vicious blow over backward point. The most extraordinary thing was how run-of-the-mill Buttler made it look.The introduction
Stokes’ first ODI hundred on home soil had changed the complexion of the England innings and he was clearly itching to get into the battle with ball in hand, too, despite a knee problem that had made him a doubt to play. Morgan brought him on in the tenth over and he almost removed de Kock with his first ball, not quite able to hold a brilliant one-handed effort in his follow-through off a miscued pull. He was not to be denied, however, as Amla thrashed Stokes’ fifth ball straight to cover to give England their breakthrough.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus