The numbers that made the difference

The three-Test series between England and India had plenty of statistical highlights. Cricinfo analyses some of the interesting ones

S Rajesh14-Aug-2007


He wasn’t always tidy behind the stumps, but Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s contribution with the bat was crucial to India’s series win
© Getty Images

The value of partnershipsEngland’s batsmen scored three centuries in the series to India’s one; there were four century partnerships for England, twice as many as the Indians managed; yet, the series scoreline read India 1, England 0.India’s triumph in the three-Test series was a victory for collective effort over personal heroics. There were as many as 14 half-centuries, and 16 half-century partnerships, which ensured that England rarely had the luxury of getting two quick wickets in succession.The list of average partnerships for each wicket also shows that England’s top order didn’t do badly. The Indian opening pair was a revelation, but England’s first three wickets did better than India’s, while the middle order (partnerships for wickets 4-6) put together healthy partnerships as well. Where they lost out in comparison to India was in the lower-order batting – their last four wickets averaged ten runs per dismissal, which means they were as good as all out when six down. The Indians scored 17 more per partnership for the last four wickets, which translates into 68 extra runs per innings.Apart from Anil Kumble’s heroics at The Oval, the difference was the performance of the wicketkeepers. Matt Prior, apart from letting through 71 byes and dropping crucial catches, also failed with the bat, averaging 14.60. Mahendra Singh Dhoni wasn’t always tidy behind the stumps, but he was superb with bat in hand, scoring 209 runs at 52.25. Without his match-saving contribution at Lord’s, India would have only managed a drawn series.



Partnerships for each wicket
Wicket Ind – Runs Average 100s/ 50s Eng – Runs Average 100s/ 50s
First 322 53.67 1/ 1 260 43.33 0/ 2
Second 163 27.16 1/ 0 319 53.16 1/ 2
Third 223 37.16 0/ 2 268 44.67 0/ 2
Fourth 336 67.20 0/ 4 300 50.00 2/ 1
Fifth 181 36.20 0/ 2 144 24.00 0/ 1
Sixth 241 48.20 0/ 3 348 58.00 1/ 2
Seventh 181 45.25 0/ 2 51 10.20 0/ 0
Eighth 95 23.75 0/ 1 52 10.40 0/ 0
Ninth 36 9.00 0/ 0 32 6.40 0/ 0
Tenth 103 34.33 0/ 1 73 14.60 0/ 0


Partnerships for each cluster of wickets
Wicket Ind – Runs Average 100s/ 50s Eng – Runs Average 100s/ 50s
1 – 3 708 39.33 2/ 3 847 47.05 1/ 6
4 – 6 758 50.33 0/ 9 792 44.00 3/ 4
7 – 10 415 27.67 0/ 4 208 10.40 0/ 0

Working out the angles“We’ve been asked different questions against the left-arm angles which we haven’t seen before,” Michael Vaughan admitted after the series, which was a tribute to the splendid bowling performances of Zaheer Khan and RP Singh. With Sreesanth off-colour through most of the series, the two left-armers were easily India’s stand-out bowlers, confusing the batsmen with their line of attack and the swing they generated. Zaheer became only the third Indian fast bowler – after Javagal Srinath and Sreesanth – to take 18 wickets in a three-Test series. As the table below shows, England’s batsmen weren’t comfortable against them no matter which side of the wicket they bowled from.



Indian left-armers, over and round the wicket
Bowler Over – balls, runs* Wickets Average Round – balls, runs* Wickets Average
Zaheer 695, 290 14 20.71 125, 63 4 15.75
RP Singh 404, 221 7 31.57 154, 110 5 22.00

The swing-and-seam factorThe only batsmen who handled India’s three fast bowlers with a measure of success were Alastair Cook and Kevin Pietersen. Pietersen was immense throughout the series against all bowlers, but Cook blotted his book by falling twice to Kumble and Sourav Ganguly, against whom he managed a miserable seven runs in 41 deliveries.



England batsmen v India’s three fast bowlers
Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average
Alastair Cook 176 314 2 88.00
Kevin Pietersen 223 367 5 44.60
Andrew Strauss 150 376 5 30.00
Michael Vaughan 140 345 5 28.00
Ian Bell 109 141 5 21.80
Paul Collingwood 84 185 5 16.80
Matt Prior 42 117 4 10.50

Sourav Ganguly’s series was spoilt by a couple of poor decisions, but despite that he averaged nearly 50 and handled England’s three fast bowlers better than any of his mates. Whether getting into line to defend, weaving out of the way of bouncers, or caressing drives through the off side, Ganguly was mostly comfortable against the three-pronged attack of Sidebottom, Anderson and Tremlett, which bodes well for India’s next two Test series, against Pakistan and Australia.



Indian batsmen v England’s three fast bowlers
Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average
Sourav Ganguly 160 315 3 53.33
Dinesh Karthik 197 399 5 39.40
Sachin Tendulkar 151 416 4 37.75
Mahendra Singh Dhoni 112 176 3 37.33
VVS Laxman 149 304 4 37.25
Rahul Dravid 90 221 3 30.00
Wasim Jaffer 156 348 6 26.00

Spin supportWith the fast bowlers doing the bulk of the damage, the two spinners on show played largely a supporting role. That wasn’t quite so unexpected for England, but Kumble would have expected to play a bigger role with the ball, especially on the last day at The Oval. He did finish with 14 wickets in all at a respectable average of 34.50, but those numbers are slightly flattering, as half those wickets comprised the four bowlers in England’s line-up. Against the specialist batsmen, Kumble was distinctly second-best. On the other hand, he also ensured that India didn’t have to suffer any of the lower-order partnerships that have become the norm when they play overseas.



Kumble v England’s batsmen
Runs Balls Wickets Dismissals
Top seven 402 724 7 57.43
Last four 70 150 7 10.00

Panesar was even more ineffective against the Indian top order, but he too benefited from getting lower-order wickets. His series average of 50.37, though, is his second-worst: the only occasion he has been more ineffective was in his first series, also against India. (Click here for Panesar’s series-wise bowling averages.)



Monty Panesar v Indian batsmen
Runs Balls Wickets Dismissals
Top seven 320 605 3 106.67
Last four 83 180 5 16.60

Head-to-headsThe table below lists five of the more interesting head-to-heads: Ganguly was supposed to be susceptible to pace and bounce, but he handled Tremlett pretty well; Pietersen had a good time against Zaheer, but found RP Singh more difficult to handle; Ian Bell and Andrew Strauss had no such luck against Zaheer, while Anderson can legitimately claim to have Tendulkar’s number.



The key head-to-heads
Batsman Bowler Runs, balls Dismissals Average
Sourav Ganguly Chris Tremlett 74/ 151 0
Kevin Pietersen Zaheer Khan 72, 143 1 72.00
Kevin Pietersen RP Singh 86, 124 3 28.67
Andrew Strauss Zaheer Khan 69, 173 4 17.25
Ian Bell Zaheer Khan 17, 30 4 4.25
Sachin Tendulkar James Anderson 69, 142 3 23.00

Oh to be at Lord's

Soumya Bhattacharya on the joys of watching cricket in England

Soumya Bhattacharya21-Jul-2007

A summer of cricket in England? We’ll drink to that. © Getty Images
I first went to Lord’s in the summer of 1993. I was then a student in Britain. I still have a picture of myself in a tweed jacket (as English as I could make myself), maroon tie, and white shirt, leaning against a board that said, “No standing when there is bowling at the other end.” I remember clearly what I’d felt that day.I had felt cheated. The ground was not bathed in the kind of sunshine with which I had thought Lord’s would be. It had rained a lot that day, and there wasn’t much cricket. The grass didn’t seem as green as I’d expected. The slope at the Nursery End had less of a gradient than I’d imagined. (What had I imagined? A real hill inside a cricket field?) And the players – county players playing an insignificant match on a rain-spattered afternoon – seemed to be going about their jobs with little enthusiasm.I wonder now what it was that would have made me happy. And I don’t know the answer.The trouble was that Lord’s and the notion of watching cricket in the English summer had been until then constructs of my imagination. They were born of airwaves (Test Match Special commentary) and literature, of poems like Edmund Blunden’s “Forefathers”:On the green they watched their sons
Playing till too dark to see,
As their fathers watched them once,
As my father once watched me;
While the bat and beetle flew
On the warm air webbed with dew.
When I went to Lord’s for the first time, I was ready for the “warm air webbed with dew”, but not for what I really saw. Cricket in the English summer in my mind had always had something to do with the quality of light, the shifting season, the sun, and the long days after the bleakness of winter. In , VS Naipaul eloquently describes the English winter light: “It went dark in the room, and I noticed that the light outside was strange. It was dead, but seemed to have an inner lividness.”Summer in England is the time when that inner lividness bursts through, when the light is as alive in shades and texture and depth as it can ever be. And cricket was the summer game (it still is called that in England, though the English team, like all international teams, play it all year round), the pursuit that to me most exemplified that season. But all of this was in the imagination. And at Lord’s in the summer of 1993, I was confronted with the reality.Once I had overcome the gulf between my construct of how things ought to be and how they really were, there were unexpected delights. For someone who had grown up watching cricket on the subcontinent, I was struck by how the whole experience could be, how civilised and pleasurable. I associated watching the game with eking out eight inches on a concrete bench for my bum, queuing endlessly for food and water, being pelted with an orange or worse if I stood up to applaud. Here there were sumptuous lunch hampers, there was wine and beer, as much space as I wanted for myself, a book for the breaks, and the patter of measured applause. Everyone seemed to be having a good time. Sometimes the cricket seemed only incidental. For someone who had grown up watching cricket on the subcontinent, I was struck by how comfortable the whole experience could be, how civilised and pleasurable Of course, cricket in England prided itself on its measured applause, in maintaining its distance from the yobs and lager louts who were invading the football stadiums. Watching cricket in Australia, I found out later, is a great thrill. It is just as comfortable as watching in England, but it is much more participatory, much more effervescent and inclusive, than watching it in England.England wasn’t in those days as multicultural as it is now. The Indian economy, having just opened up, wasn’t anywhere as strong as it is today. That summer none of the teams from the subcontinent toured. And even if they had, you wouldn’t have seen the swathe of brown faces and flags that you do now. You traditionally saw great support for West Indies at the Oval, since the south London ground was close to the areas in which thousands of immigrants from the Caribbean islands lived. But being at a game at an English cricket ground was largely the preserve of white, middle-class males – or so it seemed to me.There was a lot happening in English cricket that summer. There was the Ashes series (a six-Test one, no less), and Australia battered England 4-1. Michael Atherton became captain in the fifth Test. He won the last one. Ted Dexter resigned as chairman of selectors. Middlesex, led by Mike Gatting, won the county championship. And, yes, it was the season of the Ball of the Century: MW Gatting bowled Shane Warne for 4 in the first Test at Old Trafford.I later came to love English grounds, especially the smaller ones and their prettiness and quirks. But that first summer, my experience of watching cricket in the English summer was defined more by absence than anything else, by the lack of things that I’d believed ought to be there: the hill, the light, the shade of the grass, the genuflection from players at what I then thought was cricket’s shrine.It happens when imagination collides with reality.

The Caribbean's massive undertaking for the 2007 World Cup

Will the region be ready to host 100,000 cricket fans in seven months?

Andrew Miller05-Jul-2006In the Caribbean, the magnitude of the task that awaits the region next March is slowly beginning to dawn. Too slowly for comfort, in theopinion of many observers. In seven months’ time, the curtain will be raised on the ninth cricket World Cup, and at present the preparationsare lagging behind on all fronts.Yesterday Chris Dehring, the tournament director, finally confirmed what the rest of the world had already worked out – the influx of100,000 cricket fans, on top of the usual peak-season demands of the Caribbean tourist industry, means that hotel rooms throughout theregion will be at a premium. “We don’t expect to satisfy the entire demand,” he admitted candidly. “It is really going to be a challenge.”Contingency plans are urgently being sought, including the option of using a fleet of cruise-liners as auxiliary accommodation, but thelogistics of the tournament are threatening to overwhelm the hosts. The rich heritage of West Indian cricket has long distracted from theground-level reality: never before has such a high-profile tournament been strung across so many small – and in some cases, tiny – countries.In total, nine sovereign states with a combined population of roughly seven million (which would barely place them in the world’s top 100)are being asked to pull together to create the third biggest sporting event in the world. It is a huge undertaking for some of the world’ssmallest economies. In terms of Gross Domestic Product, five of the participants – Antigua, St Lucia, Guyana, Grenada and St Kitts & Nevis – are among the smallest 21 in the world, and only Trinidad & Tobago (89) features in the top 100 (out of 180).The Caribbean’s enduring popularity with tourists means that the poverty of much of the region has long been overlooked. The situationis not so very different from expecting Nigeria, Togo, Ivory Coast and Senegal to cut deals with their neighbours (and rivals) to host theOlympics or football World Cup. It is notable that neither of these events has yet taken place in Africa, and when the football doesfinally arrive in 2010, it will be held exclusively in resource-rich South Africa.The Trelawny pitch is rolled for the first time, as Jamaica steps up preparations for the World Cup•Andrew Miller/Andrew MillerLast week, Cricinfo was invited to Jamaica, where West Indies themselves and Pakistan are to be based for the event. The World Cupwas the only topic on anyone’s lips. Unfortunately, it was the wrong World Cup. At present, everything stops for football. Taxi driverssimply won’t budge while a match is in progress, meetings have to be delayed to accommodate penalty shoot-outs. And all the while, theclock ticks down as vital preparations remain unaddressed.Nowhere is this more apparent than in the state of the island’s venues. Last week, the disrepair at Sabina Park was showcased to theworld as West Indies slipped to defeat in the fourth Test against India. A recent cement shortage, coupled with industrial action fromthe Jamaican workforce, meant that the great ground was just a husk of its former (and future) self. Only the George Headley stand and theKingston Cricket Club pavilion were still in operation – which amounts to barely one third of the projected 21,000 capacity.And further to the north, there is the Greenfields Stadium at Trelawny. Cut from virgin scrubland and perched scenically on the topof a hill near the coast, it is the venue for the tournament’s opening ceremony and a selection of warm-up matches. Greenfields is intendedto become a prime sporting location, but at present it is just another building site, served by a single dirt track and presided over by aclutch of 110 Chinese labourers, in whose hands the island’s entire construction project seems to have been placed.China’s involvement in the Caribbean is controversial but far-reaching, and as the clock ticks down, increasingly essential. As Lyndon James, the venue manager at Greenfields, admitted, their work ethic is “very different” to that of the Jamaican population, as demonstrated by the countdown board outside their on-site compound, declaring “xxx days [sic] hard work left”.”Hopefully some of their attitude will rub off on our guys,” added James, although seeing as the interaction between the two camps wasvirtually nil, there seemed little prospect of that. The state of the wicket was none too encouraging either. In March, the JamaicaGleaner reported optimistically that the square could be ready for matches as early as June.Chinatown at Trelawny: Jamaica’s new stadium is reliant on immigrant workers•Andrew Miller/Andrew MillerIn fact, July was just days away when we saw it being rolled for the first time, under the supervision of Sabina Park’s groundsman, PatGordon – arguably the least relaxed Jamaican on the island. “We won’t know what it’ll be like until we play on it,” he stated baldly. Otherwell-placed sources confided that the ground is so remote that, after the tournament has been done and dusted, it may never again hostanother cricket match.The saddest aspect of the tournament preparations is that there seems to be little attempt to engage the local population in the activities- although seeing as they are sure to be priced out of most of the matches, it is hardly surprising that such apathy is taking hold. ACategory 1 ticket to matches at St Kitts costs US$420, roughly two months’ wages for the average blue-collar worker, while the ICCregulations stipulate that Kingston Cricket Club members have to pay for entry to their own pavilion at Sabina Park, a move that hasbeen met with predictable resentment.Perversely, what the region needs is to be cut some slack. The Caribbean lifestyle is as languid as it gets, and for all the currentfrustrations, it is this inimitable trait that will provide the World Cup with its best and most reliable failsafe. “No problem!” is Jamaica’s catchphrase, as reprinted on countless souvenir T-shirts. For those who do sample the country’s hotels, beaches, cocktails andnightlife, the experience promises to be unforgettable.What is less clear, however, is the extent of the legacy that will remain when the eyes of the world are averted once again. At present, there is little excitement, little involvement, and little evidence that the third-greatest show on earth is coming to town. It’ll be alright on the night, as these things usually are, but will the Caribbean reinvent itself in the manner that Germany has done through the football World Cup this past month? On the current evidence, the answer has to be “no”.

Tendulkar and Smith share the spotlight

Stats highlights of the second day’s play of the third Test between South Africa and India at Cape Town

Kanishkaa Balachandran03-Jan-2007


No homesickness for Sachin Tendulkar as he now has the best away record for all Test batsmen
© AFP

5737 – Sachin Tendulkar’s runs in Tests away from home – a world record. In 75 away Tests, he averages averages 54.63. He edged past the record set by Brian Lara, who now has 5736 runs in 66 Tests. With both players still active, one can expect this record to change hands frequently.414 – India’s highest total in South Africa, going past their previous best of 410 at Johannesburg in 1996-97.4045 – Graeme Smith’s aggregate in Tests. He is the second youngest in Test history to reach the milestone of 4000 Test runs, at 25 years and 336 days, behind Tendulkar (24 years and 224 days).15 – Number of times Tendulkar has been dismissed by left-arm spinners in Tests.50 – Shaun Pollock’s wicket tally against India. His fourth wicket, that of Sourav Ganguly, was also his 50th at Newlands.26 – Number of times VVS Laxman has been bowled in Tests. He has suffered the most against Pakistan, castled six times.174 – Runs added by the last seven Indian wickets, after the openers put on 153. India lost their last five wickets today for the addition of just 19 runs.175 – Sourav Ganguly’s strike rate against Makhaya Ntini (14 off 8 balls). Ganguly scored at a healthy rate against all bowlers, and his strike rate against Pollock was 90.47 (19 off 21 balls).3.57 – VVS Laxman’s strike rate against Dale Steyn. Laxman plodded around for 27 deliveries and scored just one run against him, before being comprehensively bowled.91.66 – Smith’s strike rate against Sreesanth, scoring 22 off 24 balls, including four boundaries. The only bowler who managed to keep him quiet was Munaf Patel, who didn’t concede a single run off 15 deliveries.10 – Number of innings it has taken for Hashim Amla to score a half-century. His last fifty was against New Zealand at Johannesburg last year.

Kumble's first-day heroics, and home bully Hayden

Stats highlights from the first day of the Boxing Day Test between Australia and India

S Rajesh and HR Gopalakrishna26-Dec-2007


Matthew Hayden has scored 19 of his 25 centuries at home
© Getty Images
  • Anil Kumble brought India back into the contest after a poor first session, and his five-wicket haul was the second time in successive Boxing Day Tests that a spinner took five on the first day. Last year Shane Warne destroyed England, taking 5 for 39 to bundle them out for 159. These are the only two instances in the last 70 years of spinners taking five-fors on the first day of a Melbourne Test.
  • Much has been said about Kumble’s reliance on a wearing pitch for his success, but he has now taken ten five-wicket hauls in the first innings of a Test. His first-innings average is 32.92, which isn’t a lot more than his career average of 28.56.
  • This was also Kumble’s tenth five-for against Australia. Only Richard Hadlee (14), Sydney Barnes (12) and Tom Richardson (11) have more five-wicket hauls against them.
  • When Kumble had Phil Jaques stumped, it was his 21st such dismissal, which is a record by an Indian bowler. Subhash Gupte held the earlier record with 20.
  • Matthew Hayden’s 124 is his sixth century in nine Tests at the MCG, and his third in successive games. He averages 78.84 at this ground, well above his career average of 53.04.
  • The innings also confirmed his penchant for the Indian bowling attack. In 12 Tests against them, Hayden averages 65.14, with four centuries – the most by any Australian batsman against India – and six half-centuries.
  • Hayden has scored 19 Test hundreds in Australia, which is a record for any batsman at home. Don Bradman and Ricky Ponting have 18 each, while Brian Lara has 17. Hayden averages 62.01 at home; overseas, the number drops to 43.57.
  • Rahul Dravid’s two catches in the Australian innings takes his Test tally to 159, which puts him fourth in the all-time list, after Mark Waugh (181), Brian Lara (164) and Stephen Fleming (161).
  • Nothing to separate the finalists

    A statistical preview to the final of the ICC World Twenty20 between India and Pakistan

    S Rajesh and Mathew Varghese23-Sep-2007The road to the finalBesides the loss in the bowl-out to India, Pakistan have remained unbeaten, while India are red-hot, having won three consecutive matches against England, South Africa and Australia after a loss to New Zealand in the first match of the Super Eights.The Pakistan bowling is spearheaded by Mohammad Asif , who has been able to fox the opposition batsmen while Umar Gul has been brilliant with the yorkers at the death. Sohail Tanvir brings in variety although India had already played against him once. Pakistan’s batting rests on the shoulders of Shoaib Malik and Misbah-ul-Haq, and it will be interesting to watch how India’s bowlers cope with these two, whose calm presence in the middle lends stability to a top order that hasn’t done too well in the tournament. (Click here for Pakistan’s batting and bowling averages in the tournament.)The key battle in the match will be perhaps between Yuvraj Singh and Shahid Afridi. Afridi is the tournament’s highest wicket-taker – along with Stuart Clark – while Yuvraj has scored 128 runs off 46 deliveries in the last two games he’s played.Along with Yuvraj, India would be looking to seniors such as Virender Sehwag and Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the captain himself, to chip in with the runs. Surprisingly, it is Gautam Gambhir who has been India’s top run-getter in the tournament so far. India’s bowlers have not been as effective as Pakistan’s but they have successfully defended all scores put up by their batsmen in the tournament, RP Singh being the stand-out performer. (Click here for India’s batting and bowling averages in the tournament.)Toss and tacticsIndia and Pakistan have contrasting tactics – while India have favoured to bat first, Pakistan have preferred to chase. The final is in Johannesburg, where Pakistan have won two of the previous matches against Australia and Sri Lanka. India lost their only encounter at the Wanderers, when Dhoni opted to field against New Zealand

    Toss at Johannesburg

    Toss result Matches won Matches lost

    Won and fielded first 3 4 Won and batted first 0 1However, one must note that Bangladesh and Kenya among the teams to have fielded first and lost at the Wanderers.

    India at the ICC World Twenty20

    Batting first/second Matches Won Lost Tied NR

    First 5 3 -11 Second 1 – 1 —

    Pakistan at the ICC World Twenty20

    Batting first/second Matches Won Lost Tied NR

    First 2 2— Second 4 3 -1* -* India went on to win the tied match in a bowl-out.The first six oversThere’s hardly anything to choose between the two sides if one looks at the batting and bowling performance in the first six overs, when the fielding restrictions are on. Pakistan top order has been shaky, while apart from the 76 for 1 against New Zealand in the first six, India have tended to play cautiously and keep wickets in hand.

    Performance with the bat in the first six overs

    Team Runs/ wickets Dot balls Runs per wicket Run rate

    India220/ 810227.57.33Pakistan269/ 1013426.97.47India has done marginally better than Pakistan while fielding in the first six overs, though the fact that they had South Africa reeling at 31 for 5 in Durban skews it in their favour.

    Performance with the ball in the first six overs

    Team Wickets Dot balls Runs per wicket Economy rate

    India912223.567.06Pakistan1112024.727.55EndgameRiding on Yuvraj Singh’s clean hitting, India were able to consolidate in the last five overs against England and Australia. However, it will be tough to get away the Pakistan bowlers, especially Umar Gul, who was impeccable with his line and length in the semi-final against New Zealand.

    Performance with the bat in the last five overs

    Team Runs/ wickets Dot balls Runs per wicket Run rate

    India 286/ 14 37 20.43 11.44 Pakistan 263/ 10 36 26.3 9.74Although the Indian bowlers have been picking up wickets at the death, they have been unable to curtail the opposition from scoring runs at a fast rate, something which Pakistan have done successfully through the course of the tournament.

    Performance with the ball in the last five overs

    Team Wickets Dot balls Runs per wicket Economy rate

    India 18 122 14.39 10.36 Pakistan 19 120 10.89 7.02PartnershipsGambhir and Sehwag have been consistent at the top of the order for India, and their 136-run stand – the second-best in the tournament – set up the win against England. On the other hand, Pakistan has had trouble with the opening line-up, with Salman Butt, who was dropped for the semi-final, and Mohammad Hafeez failing to make an impression.

    Opening partnerships in this tournament

    Team Runs Average stand 100s/ 50s Run rate

    India27454.801/ 18.83Pakistan18731.167.240/ 2Pakistan’s middle order have done the bulk of scoring for their team, with Malik and Misbah both having a great run. India, however, have managed to score at a faster rate.

    Middle order stands in this tournament (for wickets 2 – 5)

    Team Runs Average stand 100s/ 50s Run rate

    India48425.470/ 38.88Pakistan57826.272/ 07.68Par scoreThe average run-rate at the Wanderers has been 8.72, and taking that over 20 overs 175 would be a decent total. South Africa scored 208 for 2 while batting second in the high-scoring opening match against West Indies, while the highest score is 260 for 6 posted by Sri Lanka against Kenya.The final will be played at 2 pm local time, and the two previous matches held in Johannesburg at that time during the tournament have seen the side batting second win. Both Sri Lanka and Pakistan chased down a target of 165 against New Zealand and Australia.Pace v SpinThe spinners have fared better than the faster bowlers at the Wanderers. While Pakistan have used Afridi and Mohammad Hafeez throughout the tournament, India have utilised only Harbhajan Singh. Both captains would be wary of employing spinners against the opposition, though, especially it the pitch is flat.

    Pace v Spin

    Bowling type Wickets Bowling average Economy rate

    Pace 55 34.148.67 Spin 37 20.51 8.20Fast numbers67 and 61 – The number of extras conceded by India and Pakistan during the tournament.235.08 and 202.22 – The strike-rates for Yuvraj Singh and Shahid Afridi in the ICC World Twenty20.12 and 8 – The number of sixes hit by Yuvraj Singh and Imran Nazir.5.36 and 6.30 – The economy rates for Umar Gul and RP Singh.46.43 and 44.77 – The percentage of deliveries bowled by India and Pakistan that have been dot balls.

    Play it again, Saqi

    The inventor of the talks spin, Twenty20 and county cricket

    Jamie Alter07-Jul-2008

    Bright-eyed and bushy-bearded: ‘I took what I learned playing in England back to the international level’ © Getty Images
    Sitting comfortably in a fold-up chair in the Players’ Dining Room outside the Surrey dressing room after the first day of the game against Kent at The Oval, arms moving about as he simulates bowling actions and shots batsmen have attempted against him, Saqlain Mushtaq looks every bit the seasoned cricketer. Add on the flowing beard and Islamic skull cap and he resembles something of a sage. Listen to sport and religion blend together in his conversation and you’re taken in by his boyish simplicity. Place it all in perspective of where he’s been the last few years, and you have a man relishing another chance to play cricket.Saqlain started as a teenage wonder, making his Test debut at 19, and became the quickest to 100 one-day-international wickets, flummoxing batsmen with the magic delivery that went the other way. He helped Surrey to the English County Championship title three times in four years, had his career damaged by injury, and made an unsuccessful attempt in 2004 to force his way back into Pakistan’s Test side, against India in Multan – a game where he was made to look like a nets bowler by Virender Sehwag, who made an epic 309.A year ago, ravaged by the second of two serious knee injuries, Saqlain looked a shadow of the bowler he had been in his international pomp. It appeared his career was over. “It was hard. Injuries played their part, and there were some selection issues. It’s in the past,” he says, his eyes fleetingly turning away behind us, where fastened on the white wall are dozen of framed photographs of Surrey’s last glory years, of which he was a starring part with 384 wickets at 20.79 in 80 matches.The group stage of the Twenty20 Cup has just wrapped up and it’s back to four-day cricket, where Saqlain has always been a star at his adopted home, The Oval. “I thrive on cricket. It don’t matter what the format, I just want to bowl,” he says.The art of the other one
    I’d heard he was reticent and uncommunicative, that you had to prod, and you’d be lucky to receive monosyllabic answers. But I found a friendly individual, who within seconds of hearing I spoke Urdu, grabbed my hand and led me into the Surrey dressing room, proceeding to parade me before Abdul Razzaq, Usman Afzaal and Scott Newman. A barrier, one that perhaps existed in the words of others, had been broken.I suggest that perhaps an overdose of playing one-day cricket affected his bowling in Tests, but he brushes that aside. “Never. Alhamdulillah, I was fortunate to be able to adjust to conditions and pressure early in my career and as I progressed. Test cricket, one-day cricket, Twenty20, all of these I picked up easily. I figured out each format early.”The , he says with pride, is a weapon he honed during his youth, playing at home on the terrace. “We used to play as boys using a table-tennis ball; that’s where I picked it up. I then bowled it in professional cricket later. Later I played with the taped ball, which is big in Pakistan. It worked there too.”There has been criticism that Saqlain used the too much, particularly early in his career, but the man himself is quick to defend his methods. He talks about observing the way a batsman stands at the crease, what his preferred shots are, his style. “If a batsman is playing straight, not cutting or playing much to the off side, or is playing more off his legs, then I bowl where he’s uncomfortable, making him play. Often to the non-Asian batsmen, who I feel are susceptible, I used to bowl the first to give them a [shock]. The Asian players – Indians, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans – their footwork is better and they have a better understanding of how to play spin, using their wrists, so I had to be more observant and not try too much too soon.”” gave me a talent and variety in my bowling, and after that whatever I learned was from Twenty20 cricket Wasim Akram regularly used Saqlain inside the first 15 overs of an ODI, as well as at the death – often even in the penultimate over. “The thinking was just that I had to get batsmen out,” Saqlain says with a hearty laugh. “The ball is hard at the start and soft by the end but I never thought about such things. I had one thing on my mind and that was getting wickets. If you stray here and there and don’t think about what’s important – line and length – then negatives can creep into your head. Wasim backed me and I just had to deliver.”Oh to be in England
    Saqlain is only 31 but has assumed the role of senior statesman in the Surrey dressing room. The move to English county cricket, he says, was crucial. “Those were great years. You develop your game, you learn. I want to work hard and bring back those years to Surrey.”A veteran on the county circuit, having gone from Surrey to Ireland to Sussex and now back to Surrey, Saqlain says the moves were not purely for financial reasons but targeted at gaining exposure. “You definitely need to play in different conditions, on different tracks, against different batsmen. You learn a lot that way. And I took what I learned playing in England back to the international level. If you play in one place or against one type of player, you won’t go anywhere. “There was speculation over his future after he left Sussex halfway through a two-year deal. Saqlain had not featured much that summer and made only four Championship appearances taking 14 wickets. “I went to Sussex because I had no other option at the time. They looked after me very well, they kept in mind my expectations and gave me a deal which matched my requirements,” he says matter-of-factly. “But I came back here to London mainly because there are better education options for my three children. I’m conservative and wanted my kids to get a proper Islamic education. That wasn’t there for me up in Sussex. I’ve been settled in London since 1998 and my family and relatives and friends are all here. Commuting and looking after the kids’ education became tough. The kids have a good school here. Thankfully, Surrey approached me with a deal, it worked out well, and I here I am.”And what of the rigorous county schedule? “We play a lot of cricket in England and it is demanding, but that’s your job and you learn to adjust. I enjoy it, keeps me busy.”He only smiles and nods when asked if his readiness to play for England – he’s qualified for a British passport through marriage – still stands, but is eager to point out that apart from Monty Panesar, the spin scene in England is weak. And he should know. “Until now, Monty’s [Panesar] the only quality spinner I’ve seen. Spin has never been England’s strength. I’ve not seen anyone extraordinary on the circuit. There are good bowlers, definitely, but no one really stands out. Shaun [Udal] was good but he’s aged; [Graeme] Swann is playing for England in one-day cricket, but he’s not extraordinary – he’s good for one-day cricket but that’s it. Monty’s the real deal. Adil Rashid bowls well. He hasn’t gotten the wickets he deserves but he’s a good spinner.”Adapting to the short stuff
    Taking a swig of Powerade, Saqlain moves on to Twenty20 cricket, which is all the rage these days in the wake of the IPL and Allen Stanford’s agreement with the English authorities.”In Pakistan we’ve been playing such formats for some time,” he replies when asked if it was a format that took getting used to after 49 Tests and 169 one-day internationals. ” gave me a talent and variety in my bowling, and after that whatever I learned was from Twenty20 cricket. It helped me a lot – learning to change lengths and such. I had no problems adjusting to the format. My job is to take wickets, and I’m comfortable doing that in any format.”

    ‘Wasim backed me and I just had to deliver’ © AFP
    At the height of his international career Saqlain was a master of innovation, mixing flatter, restrictive deliveries up with tempting flighted ones. The key in Twenty20, he says, is variation. “Obviously, in Twenty20 cricket you need to make some adjustments: the length you bowl, the pace, because the batsman is always looking to dominate. You really need to adjust quickly; it’s just that type of game. The batsman will always think that there’s nothing to lose. Also, the fielding is different.”And what of these new innovative shots – the switch-hit, the reverse sweep, the paddle-scoop? “They are encouraging. If it works, it looks good, but if it doesn’t, I’m going to get a wicket,” he says with a smile. “You really have to look at the margin of your line and length, and make sure you don’t give them much width to play these fancy shots. That’s what bowling – more so spin – is all about in Twenty20 cricket: line and length.”In Twenty20, one would think more spinners would be encouraged to bowl flat and quick because the ball will still be hard and relatively new? “That depends on how you want to bowl,” Saqlain says. “There’s a lot of research and homework being done, people analysing videos and such. Last year, when I was at Sussex, they felt the slower I bowled, the more effective I was,” he reveals. “It seemed the batsmen were easier able to hit the quicker, flatter balls.”It depends how comfortable the bowler feels. In Twenty20 cricket you definitely need to vary your length. But if you look at the scorecards of the past year, you’ll see that the average wicket-runs ratio has come down in favour of spinners who’ve bowled slow, using flight and length as their weapons.”There are also cues to pick up from a batsman before delivering the ball. “You have to really observe what’s happening in a very short span of time. You’ve got to be quick to pick up on a batsman’s style, his aggression, his back lift. There’s plenty to analyse beforehand, but out on the field you need to try and see where he’s lacking in positivism, if at all. I can usually pick up how a batsman is thinking. It’s easier in Twenty20 cricket, obviously.”During Saqlain’s international career deep midwicket and long-on, often even mid-on, used to be key field placements when he bowled. How does he set his field these days? “Offspinners rely on drift into the batsman and get more chances on the leg side. There are changes in the game now that require you to change your field placing,” he says. “For example, if a batsman is reverse-sweeping, I remove midwicket from the circle and place him at short fine leg for the top edge. If he’s sweeping for singles repeatedly, I may push a man back to encourage the second, and then slip in a quicker one for a stumping, a caught-and-bowled… I don’t want to give away my tricks!”But I most always keep a deep midwicket because batsmen fancy playing with the turn. If someone’s not looking to work the ball to the on side, I’ll then drop the midwicket and use the man somewhere else.”Meanwhile, back in Pakistan
    The talk moves back to his international career. Apart from a series of knee injuries, Saqlain slowly fell out of the reckoning in Pakistan’s one-day line-up because the management started preferring batsmen who could bowl part-time spin – the likes of Mohammad Hafeez, Shoaib Malik, and Shahid Afridi, who starkly indicative of the current scene, is Pakistan’s No. 1 spinner in ODIs. Why the dearth of quality spinners? You’ve got to be quick to pick up on a batsman’s style, his aggression, his back lift. I can usually pick up how a batsman is thinking. It’s easier in Twenty20 cricket, obviously “Matters in Pakistan change a lot. It’s all politics. We’ve had so many selection committee changes. No one seems to know what needs to be done, what makes a good spinner. So that hurts the process, and spinners can’t just come up the ranks.”You don’t just become a spinner, you have to be made into one. You need to be coached and groomed. Pakistan isn’t producing quality spinners or opening batsmen. There are no fast bowlers of the likes of Wasim and Waqar either, which is sad. Look at [Abdur] Rehman, who played two Tests and then was gone. It reflects on the changes in the board.”Saqlain says he often closes his eyes and goes back to his first Test wicket (Sri Lanka’s Chandika Hathurusingha in Peshawar, 1995), which he took with his seventh delivery. “It was unbelievable. I can never forget that. I was just 19.”I remember a lot of wickets. They stay in my mind. My favourite was getting Sachin Tendulkar in the Chennai Test in 1999… but if someone tells you that they can remember every shot played and wicket taken, they’re lying.”He looks at his watch and says he needs to leave. As we descend the steps from the pavilion down towards the Alec Stewart Gate, one of the umpires, former Test player Rob Bailey, emerges from a side entrance. “Saqi” he smiles, making a spinning motion with his right hand. “Looks like there’s going to be some turn out there tomorrow. You must be looking forward, eh?” Pat comes the confident, boyish reply. “Of course, I’m always ready.”Saqlain’s Pakistan career is over but he’s embracing another shot at county cricket with open arms. The poor impersonator from Multan in 2004, lacking in confidence, rhythm and mystery, is thankfully gone and a fresher, more positive Saqlain is back. Here’s hoping he can bring the smiles back to the faces of the Surrey fans, and those who remember his feats on the international scene.

    Quantity street not so sweet

    South Australia have willingly lost Ryan Harris after he refused to accept their two-year deal

    Jenny Roesler16-Apr-2008

    Ryan Harris, South Australia’s No. 1 player, is off to Queensland
    © Getty Images

    It seems a touch crazy that struggling South Australia are happy to sit back and let their No. 1 player from last season head off to another struggling state. Ryan Harris, who was the Redbacks’ best bowler with 37 first-class wickets at 29.86 and a batting aggregate of 363, has slipped the leash and will head to Queensland once he’s played out the English county season with Sussex.But the Redbacks have a strategy – of “performance-based pay” – and their coach Mark Sorell is sticking to it. He freely admits there was enough cash in the pot to match Queensland’s bid, but to do so would not have been part of the state’s policy.”We’re very mindful of what we’re doing with the rest of our squad,” Sorell said. “Moving forward we’re looking at performance-based pay with our group. Ryan was our No. 1-ranked player. Given where he came from last year we believe it to be a very fair offer that we made.”South Australia refused to offer him anything more than a two-year deal that could be extended to three based on his output in the first year. Queensland, who finished last and already have a clutch of allrounders, offered three years straight up.Harris has not been a star in the past, and he has had his injuries too, so he had previously been on a string of 12-month deals, which wouldn’t necessarily have done his confidence much good and led him to offer his services elsewhere.However, South Australia, which has been stung previously by giving long-term deals to some of their local and imported stars such as Matthew Elliott and Greg Blewett, would consider their two-year offer very generous particularly as they stuck by him during his leaner years.Harris’ loss will clearly disappoint Redbacks fans and leave South Australia’s talent cupboard even barer following the retirements of Jason Gillespie and Darren Lehmann. The Victoria batsman Michael Klinger has joined the ship, plugging one batting hole, and they want the others filled by four fringe players from New South Wales, who they hope will sign by Monday. Quantity, it seems, has replaced quality in Adelaide.

    Time to pitch it right

    A lively pitch for the final was a pleasant sight when you consider that complete batting beauties were served up for the semi-finals

    Sriram Veera in Hyderabad12-Jan-2009

    Unlike the MA Chidabaram Stadium in Chennai, most groundmen are treated pathetically, according to Daljit Singh, the BCCI’s pitches committee head
    © Getty Images

    A lively pitch for the final was a pleasant sight when you consider that complete batting beauties were served up for the semi-finals. The new ball seamed around in the first session and though Mohammad Kaif kept dropping catches in the slips, there was good carry and bounce throughout the day. As the sun came out, the ball came on to the bat nicely. It was a perfect first-day deck and YL Chandrasekhar, the curator, walked around the arena proudly after the day’s play and Daljit Singh, the chairman of the BCCI pitches committee, too was a happy man.Good “sporting pitches” have dominated every player and fan’s wish-list and many have wondered why India have not been able to consistently produce good tracks in domestic cricket. Daljit provided a host of reasons while also lamenting the treatment of the groundsmen.”A groundsman’s condition is pathetic. We should be ashamed how we are treating them. With all the money coming in, the situation has to improve. There are good places like Chennai
    where they are treated well but in many other areas, it’s a very sad situation still. People who are running the game should be ashamed. We are hoping that in a year or two things will look up as the talk is going on inside the BCCI on how to make the associations realise the importance of groundsmen and on the art of producing good wickets.”The art of preparing a good pitch is yet to be perfected in India. Six weeks back, the board sent out a guide book on preparing pitches to all associations and have asked them to get it translated into local languages. So what does the book contain? Daljit explains. “Apart from knowing how to lay a wicket, the type of soil (red or black etc), the correct mixture of morrum and clay and the correct grass (Bermuda hybrid is the best), it also comes down to how you prepare the wicket.”The classic example is the 2006 Champions Trophy at the CCI ground [Brabourne Stadium] in Mumbai. They produced awful wickets – slow, low and powdery pitches spoiled the game so much that the final was almost shifted out of it. Andy Atkinson, the ICC grounds guy [chief pitch consultant], brought glue from England and all that. It was a farce. We later discussed with the local people how they prepared. We learnt they would mark the wicket and zero-cut the grass. That’s old and outdated.”Cut the grass? Daljit gives the dummy’s guide to preparing a pitch. “You should have liberal grass – now we have stipulated a 6mm standard – when you prepare a wicket. And four inches of soil under the wicket to produce good hard pitch. First you wet it properly – don’t flood it and say you have wet it but wet it three-four times a day for two or three days. Then you bring the rollers – use the light rollers for the cross roll and diagonal roll and the heavy roller for straight roll.”The top one-and-a-half inches dries from sun and air. The below two-and-half is through transpiration (evaporation of water from plants). If we have deep root and good foliage on top, then the transpiration takes place. If that doesn’t happen, the wicket below doesn’t get hard. If we don’t keep liberal grass on top it will affect [the hardness of the pitch]. The rolling only smoothens the wicket; it doesn’t harden the surface inside.”The cricket soil should swell when it’s wet. The heavy roller just shapes the wickets, not dry it. If you understand this, you can make hard wickets. The CCI have learnt that now and have started producing fantastic wickets. The ones produced for the Ranji Plate League final last year and the three games that were played there this year [in the Ranji Trophy] were all good wickets.”The other thing that Indians grounds don’t have is proper drainage blocks around the pitch. “In the long run it spoils the root of the grass and so much muck gets accumulated below that wickets go from bad to worse,” Daljit says. “We got to have drainage around.”The BCCI, which has been conducting pitch seminars for the groundsmen in recent times, has asked each association to name four grounds they will maintain next year for its matches. “Since too much cricket is being played in a season – trial games, camps, inter-district matches, local tournaments, Ranji Trophy, IPL – there is no time to rest the pitches,” Daljit says. “With more grounds, the association can spread their games better.”As a parting shot, Daljit once again talks about the plight of the groundsmen. “They are unfortunately not trained. All the people come to this profession as means of picking up a job or just for the love of cricket. Time has come to make it a profession.”

    Harris leaves 'buffet bowler' tag behind

    The Australians must have been waiting for table service at Newlands,where they failed to handle what Harris dished up in a Man-of-the-Match performance that earned him his best match figures of 9 for 161

    Brydon Coverdale in Cape Town22-Mar-2009
    Australia failed to handle what Paul Harris dished up on the fourth day © AFP
    It was less than a year ago that Paul Harris was described by GeoffBoycott as a buffet bowler because “you just help yourself”. TheAustralians must have been waiting for table service at Newlands,where they failed to handle what Harris dished up in aMan-of-the-Match performance that earned him his best match figures of9 for 161.It’s a mark of a quality spinner to thrive in unhelpful conditions andon a surface where things could have gone badly wrong for Harris, heinvented ways to be threatening. His second-innings return of 6 for127 was even more impressive considering the comments of Australia’scaptain Ricky Ponting, who said that Harris might have turned a coupleout of the rough to the left-handers but against the right-handersbarely spun a ball.A tall man at 196 centimetres (6 foot 5), Harris looks like he shouldbe ambling in off the long run and sending down Jacques Kallis-likeseamers. His seemingly innocuous style and his habit of makingself-deprecating comments about picking up wickets only becausebatsmen try to slog him add up to create an image of a gentle giant, ajoker who perhaps feels he doesn’t belong at Test level.Nothing could be further from the truth. Harris is a fierce competitorand it was on display on the final day in Cape Town, where he had averbal clash with Michael Clarke, a man he has dismissed four times inthe past three months. He didn’t end up getting Clarke’s wicket but hedid ensure that things didn’t stagnate as Australia’s middle orderbegan to make steady progress.”Boys will be boys out on a cricket field,” Harris said. “You say afew words and it gets a bit heated every now and again. Clarkey playsthe game hard and I play the game hard, and that’s why we have goodTest matches against Australia. I have no ill feelings towardsClarkey. He’s a hell of a cricketer and a nice bloke. It’s just thefact that we both play hard cricket and we both played hard today.”As well as being tough with his words, Harris is a smart bowler.Whereas Australia’s various spinners over the past six Tests havebattled to have any real impact, he has picked up 24 wickets at 32.58and has been an under-rated part of South Africa’s attack. He hasfound ways to affect matches and at Newlands, on a flat pitch, heconstantly drifted the ball into the pads and altered his speed andlength.He’s the kind of bowler who can be carted over the boundary for 26 inan over by Mitchell Johnson, as he was in Johannesburg, yet retain theconfidence to toss the ball up. It takes a brave and skilled spinnerto do that and get away with it. It also takes a tough man to shakeoff the harsh criticism that Harris received in England last year,from Boycott and others, and become a stronger Test player.”I dreamt about [this kind of match] but whether or not I thought itwould happen, I don’t know,” Harris said. “It’s an interestingquestion. I’m just happy that it’s come full circle. I know I’vealready said it’s my favourite ground but I’ll say it again, it’s myfavourite ground in the world. To come back here and play in front ofmy folks and my wife, it’s been a great day.”The last three months, I’ve probably bowled the best I’ve bowled inmy career so far. To play under guys like Graeme [Smith], and Jacques[Kallis] in this Test match, it’s a dream for every boy growing up toplay with these guys. I’m living a dream and I hope it carries on fora long time.”Harris has long since shrugged off the criticism from Boycott butthere is a lingering resentment. When asked if he had a message forBoycott, who was in the Cape Town crowd to watch Harris’ career-bestperformance, he couldn’t resist a dig.”Look, everyone is entitled to their opinion,” Harris said. “I thinkhe gets a bit personal sometimes. That’s his way of doing things.No-one ever stands up to the guy. I recently stood up to him in thepress and said what I think of him, so it’s not a secret. I respecthim as a cricketer but I don’t think I respect him too much as abloke.”Harris, on the other hand, is winning respect for his on-fieldefforts. The buffet is officially closed.

    Game
    Register
    Service
    Bonus